[fnord]

That kind of timeline is full of problems, aint it? Of course, right now, we have no idea of:

• When the child was removed/left the house.
• Whether she was alive or dead already
• When (and how) she died
• When her body left at the dump site

AFAIK, no evidence of child was found in the SUV, so that makes the transportation even more problematic.

Other unanswered questions: If DW did it, he took a big chance remaining at home until about 9:30 the next day (not knowing when the child would be noticed missing). Even more, returning home in his RV Saturday afternoon, finding the neighborhood swarming with searchers, blithely going to his house for a while, then departing again. Amazing balls, if you have a kidnapped child in your vehicle, or evidence thereof.

[wonders]

Ref your #453: Very good points. The timeline I posted was to test out Valpall's theory (in italics at top of post)to see how it timed out, not because I think it happened that way.

[tutstar]

These are some of the same things that really have me bugged. It would be a lot easier to swallow if the SUV had evidence of Danielle in it, or, if the RV had been at DW's house that night,or, if there were evidence of dw in VD's house.

The timeline info is interesting also. Being on the other side of the country I have no idea how close the places in point are to each other or how long it would take to drive to them from the VD neighborhood. Very interesting stuff.

I don't necessarily think DW is innocent, I am not convinced that one of the Van Dams don't know more either...and that is because of their dishonesty with the police.

Is it possible police know the answers to some of these questions and that evidence won't be presented until trial?