Un-freakin-believable! Leave it to the liberal Boston Globe to make another attempt at revisionist history. It was the REPUBLICANS who backed civil rights in greater numbers than the Dems, and THAT'S why they gained a stronghold in the South.
Just a hint, your spending to much time taking both of your feet out of your mouth.
Sooooooooooooooo Kept up the good work.
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
... but it may be harder for a Democrat to be a speaker in this situation than for a Republican. There are more conservative Democrats than moderate Republicans, and conservative Democrats tend to be more independent than moderate Republicans.You could hold a meeting of all the conservative house democrats in a phonebooth. As for "moderate" republicans, we have enough RINOs to immediately falsify the author's statement. However, it's always best to back such statements with facts. So let's consider that little old item called impeachment to test the author's theory. How many democrats in the house voted for any of the articles of impeachment? How many demos in the senate voted to convict? How many RINOs in the house and senate voted to look the other way at clinton's offenses? It is clear that the demo party has a stronger stranglehold on its members.
I'd say it's time to FREEP the Boston Globe - via email, letters to the editor, etc.....THIS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO PASS AS FACT!!!!!