I think this is a fair hypothesis. What would happen if we tracked down the fathers? Do you think it's more likely that they are normal, decent members of society, married, settled down, and raising normal children, or that they are drug using losers who can't hold down a job, or in prison themselves?
Now let me guess. It's all the women's fault. The men would be wonderful fathers but the mothers won't let them.
I don't believe the article said that and I know I certainly didn't. I believe the point is you should not dismiss the father as a viable parent just because he isn't the mother. Women do not have a monopoly on effective parenting.
Hyperbolic sarcasm does not a good argument make.
1. There are fathers who abdicate their responsibilities.
2. However, there are even more fathers who indeed, have every interest in parenting but "the mothers won't let them".
I acknowledge #1; do you acknowledge #2?
And the point of father's rights groups is that systemic sexism in the court system and the legislatures subsidizes and promotes #2, and thus makes it the prevailing case.
Now you're catching on. That's why mostly women file for divorce since no-fault "liberated" them, and since the courts lost respect for natural rights, and since lawyers stopped challenging the courts taking charge of children without adjudicating the fitness of lawful guardians.