Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rats draw fewer Anglo votes In TX( But Hispanic turnout positive sign for party = Close Border ASAP
Houston Chronicle | 3/16/2002 | By R.G. RATCLIFFE

Posted on 03/17/2002 8:15:22 PM PST by KQQL

AUSTIN -- Tony Sanchez's successful campaign for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination inspired a record Hispanic vote for a primary, but Anglo Democrats stayed home in numbers more than equal to the increased Hispanic turnout.

The Hispanic turnout, combined with a significant turnout of black voters in North Texas, made Houston's Ken Bentsen the odd man out as the U.S. Senate runoff went to a contest between 1996 Democratic nominee Victor Morales and former Dallas Mayor Ron Kirk, who is black.

The black and Hispanic primary turnout is a positive sign for the Democratic strategy of boosting minority turnout to carry the entire ticket to victory in November. The hope is an increased minority turnout will offset a steady two-decade decline in Anglo support for Democratic candidates.

But the drop-off in Anglo primary voters this year raises questions about whether the Democratic Party has further distanced itself from the state's ethnic majority.

"It's not a good trade-off if you're running statewide, you need statewide interests," said Mike Baselice, a Republican pollster working for Gov. Rick Perry's election campaign.

Baselice said there were no major contested Republican primary elections to draw Anglo voters out of the Democratic primary.

"They were the show, and people didn't go to the show," Baselice said.

Sanchez pollster Paul Maslin said it is too early to read anything into the Anglo turnout in the Democratic primary in connection to what might happen in the general election.

"A bunch of Anglos decided, `You know what? The real election is going to be in November, and I don't have to vote in this primary,'" Maslin said.

Maslin said former Gov. Ann Richards, a Democrat, won in 1990 with just 40 percent of the state's Anglo vote.

"Tony Sanchez is not going to need the exact same percentage of Anglo vote that Ann Richards got in 1990," Maslin said. "Any way you do the numbers, our target will be somewhat lower than that (40 percent)."

Traditionally, Hispanics contribute only about 15 percent and blacks about 10 percent of the general election vote in Texas, although the black turnout jumped up to 16 percent in the 2000 presidential election.

But both groups usually vote overwhelmingly for Democratic candidates -- 75 percent of Hispanic voters and 90 percent of black voters.

The ethnic portrait of the Democratic primary is dramatically evident when this year's voting is compared with 1994, the last nonpresidential election year with a healthy Democratic turnout. The 1998 primary turnout was too low in all segments to be used as a point of comparison.

About 1,036,000 people voted in the 1994 Democratic gubernatorial primary when incumbent Richards faced only token opposition.

In this year's race between Sanchez, former Attorney General Dan Morales and two little-known opponents, about 1,028,000 people voted.

Sanchez with his $20 million campaign this year created enthusiasm among Hispanics that is immediately evident.

Voting in South Texas was up by 77,000 ballots over 1994. In Bexar County alone, balloting increased by 24,000 votes over 1994.

In West Texas, El Paso County's Democratic balloting this year reached almost 65,000 votes. That is 31,000 more votes than 1994 and 19,000 more than were cast in that county in the 1990 Democratic primary, which was the highest statewide turnout in 24 years.

But the Democratic turnout this year in predominantly Anglo regions was down by 125,000 votes from 1994.

Just in East Texas -- home of the die-hard Yellow Dog Democrats -- turnout was down 31,000 votes from 1994 and 73,000 from 1990.

The only predominantly Anglo area of the state that saw an increase in votes was North Central Texas, where there was a substantial increase in black voters turning out for Kirk in Dallas and Fort Worth.

Lieutenant governor nominee John Sharp and his political advisers developed this year's political strategy after his 1998 defeat in a race for the same office.

Sharp believed he and comptroller candidate Paul Hobby lost to their Republican opponents because there were no minorities on the Democratic ticket to give blacks and Hispanics an incentive to vote. Sharp recruited Sanchez into the race.

Southern Methodist University political scientist Cal Jillson said the kind of ticket that Sharp put together someday can be a winning combination, if not in this election, because of the growth of the state's Hispanic population.

"The future of the Democratic Party is as a multiracial, multicultural dream team," Jillson said.

Jillson said Bentsen had an opportunity to inspire Anglo voters to turn out, but he never energized them.

Jillson said the Republican Party faces the long-term problem of being perceived as a "very light-complected" party.

"Over the long haul that will be a problem for them," Jillson said. "You've got the Tony Sanchez enthusiasm versus the Xavier Rodriguez defeat."

Rodriguez was Perry's appointee to the Texas Supreme Court. He was defeated by Steven Wayne Smith, a lawyer who helped end affirmative action in Texas higher education. Rodriguez's loss leaves the Republicans with no Hispanics on this year's statewide ballot.

Chuck McDonald, a public relations consultant who worked for Richards, said Democrats can win this fall with as little as 37 percent of the Anglo vote so long as they boost minority turnout.

McDonald said the ticket will have to offer a broad ethnic appeal, though.

"Are you viewed as the inclusive party of all people of Texas or as the party of Hispanics and African-Americans?" he said.

"That's the balancing act the Sanchez campaign is facing. That's why John Sharp is critical to this campaign -- he's the moderate Anglo appeal," he said.

He said Sanchez, like Richards, needs to find a message that attracts Anglo women -- such as job stability and improving education.

Richards won in 1990 by gathering 61 percent of the women's vote, including 21 percent of the Republican women, according to exit polls. But in her 1994 re-election defeat, Republican women voted for Republican George W. Bush.

Antonio Gonzalez, president of the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, said 33.6 percent of the Democratic primary vote this year was Hispanic voters.

"That's absolutely a record high for a Texas primary," Gonzalez said. "That's clearly a response to a competitive race with Latinos at the top of the ticket."

Gonzalez said he recognizes that part of the high percentage is a result of the low turnout among Anglos. Gonzalez said there are two theories on why the Anglo vote declined.

"One is they're disappearing. Men are going Republican," Gonzalez said. "The other theory is Anglos didn't have a candidate. They weren't buying Morales' appeal, and Bentsen didn't energize them."

Sanchez pollster Maslin said the important thing about this primary is that Sanchez proved he could win in every section of the state. He said the campaign's message of improving education and health care resonated with Democratic Anglos.

Maslin said Morales was leading Sanchez 40 percent to 14 percent among Anglo voters in January, but Sanchez ended up winning the Anglo vote in the primary by about 12 percentage points over Morales.

"That's a 40 point turnaround in two months. That does not show me that Anglos were not responding," Maslin said.

"What we have seen in our polling all along is Sanchez's message is working everywhere."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Dog Gone
We proved it could be done with the Orlando Sanchez campaign in Houston

The only thing proved in the Orlando Sanchez campaign was that Hispanics would vote for a Hispanic candidate and Blacks vote for a Black candidate. In Houston this worked to Lee Brown's advantage. In November, Blacks and Hispanics will each have a Democratic candidate leading the ticket and will likely beat the white Republicans.

21 posted on 03/18/2002 9:45:20 AM PST by log_cabin_gop_boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: XBob
I too think the GOP will pull it off this fall. Texans only have to look across the border to see how Hispanics perform in power. By the way, I couldn't believe that "spanish debate." In a few years, all state government south of the Nueces river will be conducted in spanish. Talk about assimilation.
22 posted on 03/18/2002 9:47:00 AM PST by TaxMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: log_cabin_gop_boy
In your dreams, pal.
23 posted on 03/18/2002 9:49:35 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: antidemocommie
Of course. Haven't you finished your indoctrination program yet. Everyone knows that blacks and hispanics cannot discriminate against anyone because they are the protected minority. --sarcasm if not apparent [you'd be surprised]
24 posted on 03/18/2002 9:50:15 AM PST by TaxMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Errr. I am a Republican from Texas that now lives in California. But, I have seen what has happened in California over the last ten years and can see the demographic trends in Texas mirroring California.

In November we know that 95% of Blacks will vote Democratic

80% of Hispanics will vote Democratic

35-40% of whites will vote Democratic. Things look bleak for the GOP in Texas.

25 posted on 03/18/2002 10:00:19 AM PST by log_cabin_gop_boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: log_cabin_gop_boy
I think it's just amazing that Texas could go from being the only big state with 100% Republicans in statewide office, to having an outlook that is "bleak" in just four years.

Count how many blacks are in the US Senate today, and then tell me with a straight face that Texas is going to elect one who is virtually unknown outside of the city of Dallas.

Bleak indeed.

26 posted on 03/18/2002 10:04:18 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Not bleak but very concerning. Given the racial demographics that will make anglos a minority in the near future, Texas Republicans should be concerned given hispanic and black voting trends.

Per the 2000 US Census: Texas' population: 20,851,820 of which black's constitute 11.5%; hispanic 32% and white 52.4%.

27 posted on 03/18/2002 10:21:42 AM PST by TaxMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TaxMe
The trend is not good, if traditional voting patterns remain the same. Of course, minority voting strength hasn't been proportionate to population, either.

It's not going to pose a problem this election, but there's little doubt that the GOP must make inroads into the minority voter population in order to survive.

28 posted on 03/18/2002 10:27:01 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
What are your thoughts on where such inroads may be made. I think the consensus seems to be in the hispanic community. While blacks can be very socially conservative, their community in general seems to be stuck in the politics of victimhood worshipping at the feet of the DNC god [why else would any race vote 92% for one party?]. In contrast, the hispanic community is more opportunistic in taking benefit of the educational and employment avenues available for all Americans. While I have issues with hispanic's ability to assimilate into our common culture, there community appears to be more receptive to the GOP message of self-reliance.
29 posted on 03/18/2002 10:38:21 AM PST by TaxMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: KQQL
Don't have time to read comments, all I can think is "so that's the reason Mr. Bush is doing the amnesty thing".
32 posted on 03/18/2002 11:00:41 AM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirited
Don't have time to read comments, all I can think is "so that's the reason Mr. Bush is doing the amnesty thing".

And if he thinks by opening the borders and declaring a blanket amnesty the Latino vote will just fall into his lap, he doesn't know the power of local RAT workers or the abject murderous hatred minorities have for the Republican party.

33 posted on 03/18/2002 11:08:20 AM PST by Euro-American Scum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TaxMe
It appears that it isn't possible to make inroads in the black voting group. Bush ran a very inclusive campaign, showcasing blacks at the GOP convention and letting it be known that Powell would be the choice of Secretary of State and Rice the National Security Advisor.

He was outspoken for his desire to see vouchers, which blacks overwhelmingly support.

All to no avail. It's difficult to imagine a more overwhelming rejection by a voting block or anything else he could have done to prevent that.

Hispanics never have voted as monolithically as blacks, although the poorer classes tend to vote Democrat as the party of handouts. So, clearly the opportunity is there. We've also seen where a conservative hispanic candidate can draw overwhelming support from that group. The same cannot be said about conservative blacks.

Assimilation is also a problem, but not to the extent that we see in the black population. I think a stronger case can be made that most blacks haven't assimilated, even though in many cases their families have been Americans longer than many whites. Their neighborhoods are more segregated than hispanic neighborhoods and that group has professional poverty pimps unlike the hispanic community. Blacks have even made up phoney baloney cultural ideas like Kwanzaa.

Obviously, these are generalizations, and as blacks move up the economic rung, they are more likely to move out of those neighborhoods and vote Republican. Additionally, there are certainly hispanic enclaves that rival the worst inner city neighborhoods.

But I see many hispanic professionals in business here in Texas, and most vote conservatively. It's so common that I rarely even give it a second thought, whereas the black professional is still a relative rarity. Of course, many hispanics in Texas were here before the war for independence and hardly a part of a new immigration wave.

We can continue to attract hispanic voters to the Party. I have litte doubt of that. But black voters? We should continue our efforts, but I am extremely doubtful that we'll have much success.

34 posted on 03/18/2002 11:10:04 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: RLK

36 posted on 03/18/2002 12:07:22 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thorn11cav
When they want to go home to Mexico, they just get caught by the INS,... a free meal and a bus ride home. If they commit a crime the fastest way out of town is the..."INS bus service."

Dude, you got that from a Cheech and Chong movie.


37 posted on 03/18/2002 12:13:27 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: log_cabin_gop_boy
The only thing proved in the Orlando Sanchez campaign was that Hispanics would vote for a Hispanic candidate

Sanchez didn't carry an overwhelming percentage of the "Hispanic" vote. There was a considerable vote against Sanchez in the "Hispanic" community because he is from Cuba rather than Mexico.

38 posted on 03/18/2002 12:21:52 PM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
There was a considerable vote against Sanchez in the "Hispanic" community because he is from Cuba rather than Mexico.

If that is truly the case then Tony Sanchez can expect even more votes than Orlando Sanchez in Houston as well as the rest of Texas. This is not to mention the Black vote in Houston and Dallas that will vote 90% for the Democrats if Kirk is on the ticket.

39 posted on 03/18/2002 12:58:13 PM PST by log_cabin_gop_boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
Sanchez didn't carry an overwhelming percentage of the "Hispanic" vote. There was a considerable vote against Sanchez in the "Hispanic" community because he is from Cuba rather than Mexico

Orlando Sachez got 75% of the hispanic vote. That's overwhelming in any dictionary.

40 posted on 03/18/2002 1:02:50 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson