Posted on 03/16/2002 12:50:08 PM PST by Tancredo Fan
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:05:07 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
As I've stated numerous times, I'm pro-immigrant and pro-immigration, and anti-illegal.
You argue like a Democrat.
So typical.
So typical.
What's typical is that I've attacked Dane's dishonest and hollow arguments. I do it a lot.
In what way do you believe I've been shown to be wrong about President Bush?
You argue like a Democrat.
Yeah right, whatever sabey. You believe what you want to believe. Your clique will be behind you, except for this thread where the clique response seems to be,
"Bump for later"
LOL, that comes from a person who is so insecure that he thinks that a picture signature of a tiger is intimidating.
Yep devastating. /sarcasm
Oh be serious.
I post it because I think it's fun.
I post it because I think it's fun.
Whatever, personally I think it is pompous.
That's fine... you're entitled to that opinion.
Off-topic, though.
By HENRY ROMERO
Reuters
ENSENADA, B.C. -- Federal police on Monday evicted some 200 U.S. retirees from a multimillion- dollar beachfront resort in northwestern Mexico following a Supreme Court ruling that changes the ownership of the land.
Some 250 armed officers took part in the raid on the Baja Beach & Tennis Club in Ensenada, Baja California.
"They are going from house to house," Baja California Homeowners Association vice president Leigh Zaremba told Reuters. "We've been given five hours to get out of our houses before they are sealed."
U.S. retirees own about 90 percent of the homes at the Baja Beach and Tennis Club. They paid local farmers and a private developer, Koster S.A., between 500,000 dollars and 1 million dollars for each of the villas.
The resort property comprises a hotel, 18 cabins and 23 houses and is valued at about 48 million dollars.
Click the link for the rest of the story.
Whatever.
The whole funny part of this thread is that it was started by someone anti-immigrant, when the article of this thread basically refutes all the accusations you all throw at the Bush administration.
That's where My brother got screwed. The Ijido (sp?) tribe received title to the land on the Punta Banda sandspit in the late 60s from Mexico, in honor of some old treaty.
They leased parcels to Americans in good faith, but a few changes of government and greased palms later, Punta Banda was turned over to a couple of families who claimed the land prior to the grant to the Ijido.
The American leases were simply nullified.
As my brother says... "That's why they call it Mexico."
Er, I posted the article, and I'm anti-criminal. How do you justify the 'anti-immigrant' allegation? Sounds like a witch hunt. (LOL)
Yes, and the prima facie evidence of its dishonesty is the ramrodding of last week's 245(i); the purported "shock" that INS delivered a visa six months late (coupled with his campaign promises of 2000 to make the INS deliver its services in a timely fashion); Ashcroft's seeming surprise that the worst agency in the United States government - and one over which he has oversight duties - is not up to snuff; and the insane joke of discussing anything about immigration policy while ignoring the desperate - and I do mean desperate - straits of the INS.
There has not been a single remedy applied to INS and its problems since January 2001. Not one. But GWB is content to feed it with thousands and perhaps millions of additional cases while the agency implodes. Why? It makes no sense.
On this issue GWB is either (a) completely out of touch with reality or (b) lying through his teeth.
Yep with the hyperbole that has been seen by your clique in the last few days, you guys are the experts on witch hunts.
Greased palms being the key words.
Both!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.