Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Panel Rejects Pickering
Yahoo/AP ^ | March.14,2002 | Jesse J.Holland

Posted on 03/14/2002 2:39:32 PM PST by Reagan Man

WASHINGTON - The Democratic-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee voted along party lines Thursday to kill the nomination of Judge Charles Pickering to the appeals court, handing President Bush a stinging defeat in a racially-charged confirmation battle.

In a series of roll calls, the panel also snubbed Bush's request to allow a vote in the full Senate on Pickering, a 64-year-old Mississippian with more than a decade on the bench.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-243 next last
To: linn37
Pickering has NOT been voted down by the senate, the judiciary comitee voted not to allow a vote..BIG difference.

Also, this is a PERFECT issue for President Bush to illustrate the partisan, obstructionist posture of the Daschle senate. THIS is why Pickering was not withdrawn, and why President Bush made that statement (which was virtually ignored by the press corp) yesterday.

121 posted on 03/14/2002 4:00:25 PM PST by FreeperinRATcage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Mrs. Carnahan would NEVER have been allowed to be seated as a Senator if she was a Republican !

The Republicans should have offered their condolences but should not have GIVEN AWAY a Senate seat.

122 posted on 03/14/2002 4:00:56 PM PST by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
REPORT FROM THE BELLY OF THE BEAST:
I was there. Schumer flat out said "We already have one Scalia and one Thomas which is two conservatives too many. I will only support moderates." Chuckie is also on record as saying to committee members "There are too many committees. Why don't we just eliminate them and vote along ideology."

Schumer is a Gooey Piece Of SH** !


123 posted on 03/14/2002 4:01:14 PM PST by RFP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Bush has nobody to blame but himself. He cast Pickering to the wolves, then sat on his ass until the eleventh hour. When he finally bothered to speak up in defense of his nominee, it was too little, far too late.

If our intrepid President is half as inept as this when it comes time to nominate Supreme Court justices, we really are in trouble.

No wonder Rehnquist and O'Connor are hanging in there.....

-Dan
124 posted on 03/14/2002 4:02:09 PM PST by Brundledan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Time for an interim appointment in-your-face.

No, it is time for the president to start to show some courage.

It does not take a lot of courage to send others off to fight, but it does take courage to go and fight yourself.

It is time for president Bush to stop inviting Ted Kennedy over for tea and crumbs, and instead take kennedy and the rest of the left apart.

Nukem

125 posted on 03/14/2002 4:05:26 PM PST by Alas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
The A$$holes just spent mega-bucks in captital!
126 posted on 03/14/2002 4:06:28 PM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RightThinkinDood
time for an interim appointment

Can't. Judicial nominees have to be confirmed by the Senate. That's in the Constitution.

Where interim apppointment (recess appointments) are used is for agency appointments, like the two that President Bush made after Christmas for two appointments that Daschle wouldn't allow a vote on, FCC chairman and another one.

Judgeships are life time appointments. The recess appointments can only serve for one year.

127 posted on 03/14/2002 4:07:09 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

By the way, I learned today that even though Clarence Thomas's nomination was TIED in the Senate Judiciary along partisan lines and the Democrats were in control of the committee, the ranking RAT at the time alowed his vote to go to the full senate - where he was barely confirmed 52-48.

This is WORSE that Justice Thomas's nomination, and he was a HECK OF A LOT more (albeit trumped-up) controversial!!

128 posted on 03/14/2002 4:07:14 PM PST by RFP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Go here and donate to GOP so we can take back the Senate.

I don't normally do this since I know there are some Libertarians here, but I hope people will get on there once a month and donate $25/mo. It will help.

Thanks.

Kick the anti-Constitutional Dems OUT !

129 posted on 03/14/2002 4:09:39 PM PST by madison46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Brundledan
You will find some FReepers who will support your position, but there are many who will disagree with you. Check out this entiire thread. No one blames Bush for Pickering not getting nominated. After all Daschle and the Dems control the Senate and the committees. It's pretty hard to get a floor vote when the Senate leader says, NO WAY!

This will continue, as long as the Dems are in the majority. But you're not quite right about "Rehnquist and O'Connor... hanging in there". Lott and Daschle have a deal, that all of Bush's USSC nominees will get a floor vote before the full Senate. It's a leftover from last years power sharing rule.

Bottom line, this entire nomination process for federal justices, has become another Wash-DC bloodsport.

130 posted on 03/14/2002 4:12:18 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I'm really pleased to see Trent "Gutless Wonder" Lott receive his due. He will NEVER fight Tommy Daschund over anything. Will he tie up the Senate and stop being a good little boy after Daschund slapped him on both sides of the face and under the chin by stomping on the nomination of his good hometown friend Charles W. Pickering? Not on your life. Lott doesn't even have the cojones to mount a filbuster 'gainst the Rats. Its due to this lack of starch in Lott's collar that made the Rats feel they could vote down Pickering without fear anything would happen to them or their precious agenda. And now dear Friends and Freepers, we need a new FREEP:

Hey, Ho Ho Ho Lott's Got To Go!!!

131 posted on 03/14/2002 4:13:45 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
There are other reasons too.

I don't doubt it for a moment. Republicans can be their own worst enemy.
Still in my book, not voting then complaining about the outcome has got to be pretty dumb. No candidate is perfect. But just imagine if we had Lazio today .. we'd also have Pickering, too ...

132 posted on 03/14/2002 4:15:30 PM PST by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
There would be nothing illegal about appointing a judge to the bench as a recess appointment. If you will recall Clinton did that weeks before he left office. Even Supreme Court Justices have begun as recess appointments. True that the judge can serve only until the beginning of the next Congress and would have to be either confirmed in the interim or leave the bench.
133 posted on 03/14/2002 4:16:12 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: madison46
Aren't the Democrats the ONLY ones to not let a nominee make it to the floor? Bork, Pickering..and someone else?

Many of Clinton's nominations were never voted on by the full Senate; several were never given a hearing by the Judiciary Committee. E.g. Helene White (blue slip), Kathleen McCree Lewis (blue slip), Christine Arguello (blue slip), Dolly Gee (no hearing), Frederic Woocher (received a hearing but no Committee vote), Bonnie Campbell (hearing but no Committee vote). Both sides play the game, unfortunately.

134 posted on 03/14/2002 4:17:01 PM PST by be131
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: be131
As long as Democrats are going to play the game of only their Judicial activists being appointed then we need to fight fire with fire! One conservative after another!

Bush was P!ssed off yesterday - I bet he's really p!ssed off tonight!

135 posted on 03/14/2002 4:23:35 PM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I look at Ashcroft's unwillingness to play hardball down in Missouri, as a big reason why Republicans don't control the Senate today. Think about it. Carnahan was dead! He was elected, not his wife.

There's nothing he could have done, campaign-wise. It's obvious that Missouri voters in general vote with emotions and sympathy rather than brains. If Ashcroft had continued a strong campaign after Carnahan died, they would have thought Ashcroft the biggest jerk on the planet, and he would have lost by a far larger margin than he did. It's also nowhere near certain that he would have won any post-election legal challenge.

Besides, when it's a single-seat margin you're talking about, everything ANYONE did way back when can be labelled as "the reason why we don't control the Senate today." It makes it too easy to sit around and blame everyone under the sun. We should just forget about the past and look towards November on this.

136 posted on 03/14/2002 4:24:03 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

The DemocRAT Party must be destroyed.
137 posted on 03/14/2002 4:24:26 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be131
No recess appointment.

Rather, retake the Senate in November. Renominate and confirm Pickering next year. And lots more like him.

In the meantime this spring, summer and fall, denounce the do-nothing Judiciary Committee for its lack of progress on filling judicial vacancies. Use it as an experience to highlight Democratic games and corruption with the American people. Use it to fundraise with GOP activists. Terrorize Cleland, Landrieu, Johnson, Carnahan and others about it.

Have the Senate GOP essentially shut the damn place down. We have the tax cut in place, there is no other immediate legislative priority. The energy bill is a waste without any ANWAR drilling. On appropriations bills the RATS need us more than we need them. Just shut the damn place down for weeks or, if necessary, months.

Enough is enough, GOP. Grow some cajones. make the lack of progress on confirmation of judges a pri

138 posted on 03/14/2002 4:24:46 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage
thanks
139 posted on 03/14/2002 4:25:05 PM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Re: your Post-I am going to go to bed tonight and PRAY that every word you wrote comes true!
140 posted on 03/14/2002 4:25:06 PM PST by Desparado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson