Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Death by the Gallon
USA Today | 7/2/99 | James R. Healey

Posted on 03/13/2002 4:13:23 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

In the 24 years since a landmark law to conserve fuel, big cars have shrunk to less-safe sizes and small cars have poured onto roads. As a result, 46,000 people have died in crashes they would have survived in bigger, heavier cars, according to USA Today analysis of crash data since 1975, when the Energy Policy and Conservation Act was passed.

The law and the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards it imposed have improved fuel efficiency. The average of passenger vehicles on U.S. roads is 20 miles per gallon vs. 14 mpg in 1975. But the cost has been roughly 7,700 deaths for every mile per gallon gained, the analysis shows.

"We have a small-car problem. If you want to solve the safety puzzle, get rid of small cars," says Brian O'Neill, president of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The institute, supported by auto insurers, crash-tests more vehicles, more violently, than all but the federal government. Little cars have big disadvantages in crashes. They have less space to absorb crash forces. The less the car absorbs, the more the people inside have to."

Tellingly, most small-car crash deaths involve only small cars - 56% in 1997, from the latest government data. They run into something else, such as a tree, or into one another.

In contrast, just 1% of small-car deaths - 136 people - occurred in crashes with midsize or big sport-utility vehicles in '97, according to statistics from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the agency that enforces safety and fuel-efficiency rules. NHTSA does not routinely publish that information. It performed special data calculations at USA Today's request.

Champions of small cars like to point out that even when the SUV threat is unmasked, other big trucks remain a nemesis. NHTSA data shows, however, that while crashes with pickups, vans and commercial trucks accounted for 28% of small-car deaths in '97, such crashes also accounted for 36% of large-car deaths.

Others argue that small cars attract young, inexperienced drivers. There's some truth there, but not enough to explain small cars' out-of-proportion deaths. About 36% of small-car drivers involved in fatal crashes in 1997 were younger than 25; and 25% of the drivers of all vehicles involved in fatal wrecks were that age, according to NHTSA data.

Questionable results. CAFE and its small cars have not reduced overall U.S. gasoline and diesel fuel consumption as hoped. A strong economy and growing population have increased consumption. The U.S. imports more oil now than when the standards were imposed.

Although federal anti-pollution regulations require that big cars emit no more pollution per mile than small cars, environmental activists seize on this: Small engines typical of small cars burn less fuel, so they emit less carbon dioxide.

Carbon dioxide, or CO2, is a naturally occurring gas that's not considered a pollutant by the Environmental Protection Agency, which regulates auto pollution. But those worried about global warming say CO{-2} is a culprit and should be regulated via tougher CAFE rules...

"Car-buying expert Bragg - author of Car Buyer's and Leaser's Negotiating Bible - says few customers even ask about small cars. Small-car sales are half what they were in their mid-'80s heyday. Just 7% of new-vehicle shoppers say they'll consider a small car, according to a 1999 study by California-based auto industry consultant AutoPacific.

"That would cut small-car sales in half. Those who have small cars want out: 82% won't buy another. To Bragg, the reasons are obvious: "People need a back seat that holds more than a six-pack and a pizza. And, there's the safety issue."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cafe; emitionstandards; suv

1 posted on 03/13/2002 4:13:23 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
When the choice is dead people or the enviornment, the left comes down on the side of the enviornment... and not on the side of the people that died. .... That is as long as the cremation place actually cremates the bodies.
2 posted on 03/13/2002 4:25:27 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
What'd you expect. The Left loves humanity but hates mankind.
3 posted on 03/13/2002 4:29:08 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Unfortunately- we can't afford an SUV for our teen- and have to buy a smaller affordable car with airbags- they are right - the kids don't want to drive "gramma"s car. AlGore wants to force us all to drive small cars to make it "fair" but this will never happen and they know it. Does anyone else's local paper always mention when an SUV is in an auto accident- ours lately has made an issue of this- it is the non use of seatbelst that is usually the one cause of death around here(too many passengers per belts)
4 posted on 03/13/2002 4:31:43 PM PST by newzhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
When they say, "Save The Planet" they don't mean the people living on it.
5 posted on 03/13/2002 4:47:02 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I wonder what the watermelons would think of my "light truck": TRUCK, CARGO, 4WD, 3/4 TON, W/WINCH, M37B1

It is a 1962 Dodge M37B1 military 3/4 ton pickup truck. It weighs 5917 lbs, and gets 7.5 mpg. The flathead six puts out only 60 hp, but the weight and the 5.86 gears make it like the fuel.

As to safety features...there are none (well, the waterproof ignition could come in handy in a flood). However, in a head-on with one of these high end SUV yuppie mobiles, your last thought as you are impaled on the steering column and your skull is caved in by the bullet proof steel dash will be that the driver of the other vehicle got his too, even with air bags, crush zones, leather and all.

Regards

J.R.

6 posted on 03/13/2002 4:48:14 PM PST by NMC EXP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
CAFE and its small cars have not reduced overall U.S. gasoline and diesel fuel consumption as hoped. A strong economy and growing population have increased consumption. The U.S. imports more oil now than when the standards were imposed.

This is very true. Despite close to 30 years of promises, Congress has failed miserably to improve our energy self-sufficiency.

U.S. Petroleum & Crude Oil Overview
(thousand barrels per day)
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
U.S. Crude Oil Production
7,035
7,804
9,637
8,375
8,597
8,971
7,355
6,560
5,834
U.S. Petroleum Imports
1,815
2,468
3,419
6,056
6,909
5,067
8,018
8,835
11,093
Total
8,850
10,272
13,056
14,431
15,506
14,038
15,373
15,395
16,927
Imports as % of Total
20.5
24.0
26.2
42.0
44.6
36.1
52.2
57.4
65.5

The one thing that COULD be done to reduce our dependency on petroleum would be to construct modern, efficient, electricly powered mass-transportation systems in our nation's most densely populated regions and urban areas.

What is High Speed Ground Transportation?

High-speed ground transportation (HSGT)-- a family of technologies ranging from upgraded existing railroads to magnetically levitated vehicles-- is a passenger transportation option that can best link cities lying about 100-500 miles apart. Common in Europe ( http://mercurio.iet.unipi.it/home.htm) and Japan (http://www.japanrail.com),HSGT in the United States already exists in the Northeast Corridor (http://www.amtrak.com/news/pr/atk9936.html) between New York and Washington, D.C. and will soon serve travelers between New York and Boston. 
HSGT is self-guided intercity passenger ground transportation that is time competitive with air and/or auto on a door-to-door basis for trips in the approximate range of 100 to 500 miles. This is market-based, not a speed based definition. It recognizes that the opportunities and requirements for HSGT differ markedly among different pairs of cities. High-speed ground transportation (HSGT) is a family of technologies ranging from upgraded steel-wheel-on-rail railroads to magnetically levitated vehicles.
The Federal Railroad Administration has designated a variety of high density transportation corridors within our nation for development of HSGT:

.

For more information, please visit the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA’s) High Speed Ground Transportation Website

7 posted on 03/13/2002 4:55:41 PM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMC EXP;newzhawk;Gritty;Eric in the Ozarks;Common Tator
    But the cost has been roughly 7,700 deaths for every mile per gallon gained, the analysis shows.

What are these morons telling us? More MPG and more deaths? What is it that they want? The damn bugs we step on are more important than our energy dependency!

8 posted on 03/13/2002 5:06:45 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NMC EXP
However, in a head-on with one of these high end SUV yuppie mobiles, your last thought as you are impaled on the steering column and your skull is caved in by the bullet proof steel dash will be that the driver of the other vehicle got his too, even with air bags, crush zones, leather and all.

Heh, there were two drunks in a Mercedes sedan that were going westbound in the eastbound lanes of I-80 in November of 1981. I was driving a ’78 Peterbilt at the time. For some reason, drunks like to aim for oncoming headlights. Anyway, I got it slowed down to about 40 when we hit. They pushed the steering axle back to the fuel tanks. At the time I was permitted for 105,500 lbs but was probably loaded closer to 103,500. There was a lot of noise and excitement, but I didn’t get bounced around much. They got the short end of the stick that morning and got to experience a twelve cylinder Detroit sitting in their lap(s). Airbags made no difference...

9 posted on 03/13/2002 5:09:09 PM PST by thatsnotnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thatsnotnice
That Pete was a conventional, not a COE I assume? Probably urban legends but You hear stories about 3 guys on motorcycles. One guy gets ahead, turns around and rides between his buddies...oops.

Regards

J.R.

10 posted on 03/13/2002 5:15:46 PM PST by NMC EXP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newzhawk
Unfortunately- we can't afford an SUV for our teen- and have to buy a smaller affordable car with airbags- they are right - the kids don't want to drive "gramma"s car.

Three years ago I was shopping around for a family car. SUVs were out of my budget. Didn't really need 4WD. I found a slightly-used full-size conversion van for the same cost as a new mini-van. The van is built on a truck frame, gets decent milage, comfortably seats 7, has built-in TV for long trips with the kids. For $18.5K, I decided it wasn't bad. And if a drunk driver crashes into it, it will be HIM that gets messed up

If an SUV isn't in your budget for your kid, consider a pickup truck, slightly used.

11 posted on 03/13/2002 5:57:22 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thatsnotnice
They got the short end of the stick that morning and got to experience a twelve cylinder Detroit sitting in their lap(s). Airbags made no difference...

thats not nice

12 posted on 03/13/2002 6:17:29 PM PST by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newzhawk
I had to put myself through a lot of school and to help I sold used cars. I have always bought off leases, but you can certainly buy out of the paper or from a dealer. You would be very surprised at how low the prices go on good used SUV's, and they are safe.
13 posted on 03/13/2002 6:23:48 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"...in a YUUUGOOO...."
14 posted on 03/13/2002 7:21:39 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
There Yugo again!
15 posted on 05/16/2002 9:47:03 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson