To: isthisnickcool
I thought the CHP dispatcher neighbor was a van damning witness. Prosecution brought her on to show what a freak Westerfield was. What Feldman did, was expose that she could remember nothing, days before, or days after, but this one night, she carved out of the year 2002, to remember everything an unsuspected neighbor did? Very coached and incredible witness, IMHO......
First sign that the Prosecutions case has many holes in it????
15 posted on
03/11/2002 5:31:45 PM PST by
FresnoDA
To: FresnoDA
Admittedly, I haven't been following this case at all (my interest on FR is more Foreign Affairs. Just skimmed, but my question is: how do a highway patrolman and his dispatcher wife afford a house in such an "upscale neighbourhood"? Or is it really not so upscale? Or?
17 posted on
03/11/2002 5:39:58 PM PST by
wonders
To: FresnoDA
First sign that the Prosecutions case has many holes in it???? I remember in the days just after the Jon Benet murder, the police chief of Boulder, CO came on TV and said that they would get their man, after all "this isn't Los Angeles". I knew right then that they were fried. Any high profile case is hard for the prosecution to win. The defense (and it looks like Feldman is worth his price) will put the police department, the forensics collectors, the medical examiners on trial.
To: FresnoDA
I have confidence that the evidence against Westerfield is sufficient and he will be convicted. Beyond that,
who needs the aggro of arguing about it? I'm enjoying watching Fox's new dramedy, "The American Embassy."
19 posted on
03/11/2002 5:42:37 PM PST by
Amore
To: FresnoDA
"What Feldman did, was expose that she could remember nothing, days before, or days after, but this one night, she carved out of the year 2002, to remember everything an unsuspected neighbor did?"Is one more likely to remember the ordinary and routine or the extraordinary and odd?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson