Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Military Plans Nuke Hits on 7 Countries
New York Daily News ^ | 3/09/02 | LEO STANDORA

Posted on 03/09/2002 1:07:48 AM PST by kattracks

The White House has ordered the Pentagon to prepare plans for using nuclear weapons against at least seven countries and to build smaller nuclear bombs for certain battlefield situations, according to a published report today.

Tops on the nuclear hit list are China, Russia, Iraq, North Korea, Iran, Libya and Syria, according to a classified Pentagon report obtained by the Los Angeles Times.

"This is dynamite," Joseph Cirincione, a nuclear arms expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, told the newspaper. "I can imagine what these countries are going to be saying at the UN."

The Times said the secret report, given to Congress on Jan. 8, says the nuclear weapons could be used against targets able to withstand nuclear attack; in retaliation for attack with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, or "in the event of surprising military developments."

The report says the Pentagon should be prepared to use nuclear weapons in an Arab-Israeli conflict, in a war between China and Taiwan or in an attack by North Korea on the south, and possibly in an attack by Iraq on Israel or another neighbor.

The call for a limited-range arsenal was seen as an important deterrent against enemies who doubt the U.S. would use larger weapons in certain situations because of the widespread death and destruction they would cause.

The U.S. has long had a detailed plan for nuclear attack on Russia, but the new Nuclear Posture Review apparently marks the first time an official list of potential targets has been compiled.

The report acknowledges Russia is no longer officially an "enemy," but cites concern about the huge Russian arsenal of about 6,000 deployed warheads and some 10,000 smaller "theater" weapons, The Times said.

Pentagon spokesman Richard McGraw declined comment because, he said, the report is classified.

Nuclear analysts predicted to the newspaper that the report would draw strong reaction, but some insisted the Pentagon must be ready — especially after Sept. 11 — for all contingencies.

One nuclear expert, John Isaacs, president of the Council for a Livable World, said, "This is very, very dangerous talk.... Dr. Strangelove is clearly still alive in the Pentagon."

U.S. policy generally has been to consider the use of nuclear weapons against nonnuclear states only if they are allied with nuclear powers.




TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-257 next last
To: Imal
Imal points out: The Pentagon has lots of different classifications for information. This information appears to have been classified: Leak To The Press But Pretend It's A Big Secret.

That one's been around longer than "Top Secret".

This has been our deterrence policy since the 1960's that I know of. The Clintoon changed some of the strike back policies while he was destroying the intel and strike back capabilities of America. GW quietly informed the heads terrorist countries that we will strike back and maybe pre empt strikes last week. That cause some stink around terror land as their depends over flowed. They like to send young suicide bombers out but not put them selves in harm's way.

So is this for real folks or is this disinformation?

Nice for all of the left wing fish wraps to get the message out re the big stick.

101 posted on 03/09/2002 6:07:27 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: krb
And the Congress wonders why they can't be told ANYTHING.

Yes, or course.... Congress, which has an oversight role and is part of the constitutional process of "checks and balances" shouldn't be told anything. The Executive branch should be free to do anything is wants, anytime, without regard for any of the prosesses which were put in place by the founders.

Just give up the Republic and turn it all over to the Pres... nothing to worry about here... just keep moving.

Fool.

102 posted on 03/09/2002 6:07:57 AM PST by Beenliedto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"This is Dy-no-mite!"

103 posted on 03/09/2002 6:11:12 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jethro Tull
Nuclear analysts predicted to the newspaper that the report would draw strong reaction, but some insisted the Pentagon must be ready — especially after Sept. 11 — for all contingencies.

Amen to that. Acknowledging our enemies want to and will try to nuke us.

104 posted on 03/09/2002 6:11:34 AM PST by Lady GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Imal
Bingo Miss Marple. You and Imal are right on target here.

MM, your Stealth President has struck again. He has gotten the word out to the Axis of Evil and their weapon suppliers, China and Russia thanks to the LA Times. You terrorists hurt America, say good night! It will be big time TERMINAL BOHICA TIME FOR YOU ALL!>

Also, now GW knows who the leakers are. This was probably one of Da$$hole's demonicRat senators who hates GW and America. He/she/it has been called into Ms Rice's office and shown that he/she/it had to leak this info as he/she/it were the ones told. Of Course it could be multiple he/she/its. The good CIA people have some big time payback for the Rats who weakened the CIA since Carter's time. Many of these Rats are in the Senate, now!

This beats the FBI files used by Clintoon and the Hildebeast. This is treason! The traitors will straighten up and fly right or retire to spend more time with their family, who they hate! We might even see the drilling in Alaska approved after this!

105 posted on 03/09/2002 6:18:33 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #106 Removed by Moderator

To: Rudder
says the nuclear weapons could be used against targets able to withstand nuclear attack

The original article says non-nuclear attack.

107 posted on 03/09/2002 6:20:58 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; All
This cartoon is very appropriate after this controlled "leak" to the Axis of Evil countries and their weapon providers, Russia and China:

Besure to go to the right of the cartoon to see the faces of who may be next!


108 posted on 03/09/2002 6:23:43 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Not only is Dr. Strangelove alive and well, but it sounds like General "Buck" Turgidson is with him and that is probably not a bad given the character of the people we are dealing with these days.

General Turgidson: Mr. President, we are rapidly approaching a moment of truth both for ourselves as human beings and for the life of our nation. Now, truth is not always a pleasant thing. But it necessary now to make a choice, to choose between two admittedly regrettable, but nevertheless *distinguishable*, postwar environments: one where you got twenty million people killed, and the other where you got a hundred and fifty million people killed.

President Merkin Muffley: You're talking about mass murder, General, not war!

General Turgidson: Mr. President, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed. But I do say no more than ten to twenty million killed, tops. Uh, depending on the breaks.

109 posted on 03/09/2002 6:26:44 AM PST by COL. FLAGG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazarus Long
Mecca first
110 posted on 03/09/2002 6:27:23 AM PST by Bushmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
A small nuke against China? Now that would be the dumbest thing on the face of this earth- and probably the last action ever taken on the face of this earth.
111 posted on 03/09/2002 6:31:00 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
Attack China? You must be kidding. China Mart,Target and numerous other flowers of American business acumen would be out of business. Not to mention certain political figures with ties to the Chinese gravy train.
112 posted on 03/09/2002 6:41:24 AM PST by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"This is dynamite," Joseph Cirincione, a nuclear arms expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, told the newspaper.

No, nuclear weapons are considerably more powerful explosives than that.

113 posted on 03/09/2002 6:49:27 AM PST by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The Times said the secret report, given to Congress on Jan. 8, says the nuclear weapons could be used against targets able to withstand nuclear attack; in retaliation for attack with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, or "in the event of surprising military developments."

Gee, Congress kept this secret a whole month? ROFL

114 posted on 03/09/2002 6:52:07 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
according to a classified Pentagon report obtained (and now made public) by the Los Angeles Times.

Can we sue the Times for a few million? Maybe some treason charges? (We are at war)

115 posted on 03/09/2002 6:53:02 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady GOP
Something about this coming out and the word CHINA being in here does not sit well with me. Why is this? I just do not like the idea of threatening so many countries like this all at once.We must show Iraq first we are not afraid to use them then let Israel use them on who they need to then we see what the rest of the world is going to say. Terrorism must end and I understand this...but China is not someone I want to start pissing off with nuclear talk. Sorry...call me a wimp or whatever.Just how I see it right now.
116 posted on 03/09/2002 6:54:03 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: wallace212
Nuclear Ping
117 posted on 03/09/2002 6:54:54 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bump
118 posted on 03/09/2002 6:54:58 AM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
There was an excellent article from the National Post yesterday in which they said that China was totally flummoxed by Bush's visit. He was distant and pleasant, but firm. They were used to Clinton's effusive charm, which they did not respect.

It isn't a bad thing to make your enemies think you might be a bit crazy.

Heheheh.

It also occurs to me that we had an earlier leak which was subsequently discounted. That was the leak to Time about the pseudo nuclear threat on NYC.

As soon as it hit the stands, it was explained and discounted. Another two-fer: leak identified and Time with egg on their face.

Despite all the anti-Bush critics here, it is obvious to me that President Bush is very shrewd and very subtle. It is a pleasure to behold.

119 posted on 03/09/2002 6:55:45 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Why not let private citizens own thermonuclear weapons? Just like in the beginning of WWII when the Navy needed private small yachts for near shore duties, when the government needed small weapons, they could nationalize mine( ours ) and reimburse us. This way private citizens would fund this program at no present expense to the government. Just a thought. Well it's 11 o'clock, time for my pills washed down with beer!:)
120 posted on 03/09/2002 6:56:31 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-257 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson