Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WRhine
WRine, have you heard anything that this was going to be a recorded vote and not cloaked as they planned? If that's true, at least we'll be able to see who the sellouts are.
1,709 posted on 03/12/2002 8:55:54 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1708 | View Replies ]


To: Reaganwuzthebest
WRine, have you heard anything that this was going to be a recorded vote and not cloaked as they planned?

I called Tom Tancredo's office and ask if he was going to demand a recorded vote and they said yes he is. So, now we will know which members will be responsible for rewarding law breakers post 9-11.

1,713 posted on 03/12/2002 9:02:15 AM PST by healey22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1709 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
WRine, have you heard anything that this was going to be a recorded vote and not cloaked as they planned? If that's true, at least we'll be able to see who the sellouts are. There seems to be some confusion out there on this.

According to the Wash. Times the 245I vote will be cloaked, meaning that the reps vote will NOT be recorded. The numbersUSA site is indicating that the votes will be recorded. See Below:

The House is scheduled to vote on the Section 245(i) amnesty next Tuesday (March 12). Although the White House had been pushing to have the House pass 245i without a vote by attaching it in Conference Committee to an authorization bill, it now appears there will be a roll call vote on the issue. Now is the time to act. Your phone calls are urgently needed.

1,724 posted on 03/12/2002 9:14:22 AM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1709 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson