Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo doubts he can block amnesty-extension bill
Denver Post ^ | March 8, 2002 | Bill McAllister

Posted on 03/08/2002 1:24:33 PM PST by sarcasm

Friday, March 08, 2002 - WASHINGTON - Rep. Tom Tancredo takes credit for thwarting the Bush administration's last effort to offer partial amnesty to thousands of illegal residents, but Thursday the outspoken immigration foe said he may have been outmaneuvered by the White House.

President Bush has struck a deal with the House leadership to place legislation that offers an extension of amnesty on its consent calendar before Bush heads to Mexico for a state visit next week, the Colorado Republican said.

That action should ensure quick House passage of legislation that Bush has repeatedly sought from Congress. It would allow an undocumented person to receive legal standing, such as a valid green card, by filing a declaration with the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

It presumably also would require the person to have been in the United States by a certain date and have filed a declaration with the INS from an appropriate sponsor, such as a relative or employer, and pay a $1,000 penalty.

"The terms are still up in the air," said Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration, a group that has been allied with Tancredo. "We've heard to the effect that the president wants something to bring down to Mexico."

The initial Bush proposal, designed exclusively for Mexicans, once was high on the president's legislative wish list, but it was delayed after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11. However, as the president noted Wednesday in a speech to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, he now is pushing for the extension of the amnesty program known by the section of immigration law that covers it, Section 245I.

The president hailed it as a way to reunite family, separated by the border. "If you believe in family values, if you understand the worth of family and the importance of family, let's get 245I out of the United States Congress and give me a chance to sign it," Bush told the chamber members.

Tancredo, the head of a congressional caucus on immigration issues and proponent of halting virtually all immigration, said he had blocked a previous attempt by Bush to push an extension of the amnesty program through the House. But this time, he said House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., had agreed to place the issue on the suspension, or consent, calendar, making it difficult to defeat the proposal.

The Senate might be more favorable to the bill than the House, expanding the numbers of individuals who can apply, Tancredo said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freetrade; hughhewitt; immigrantlist; nwo; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 2,941-2,945 next last
To: Dane
Since you can't make your case, anything you have to say on this topic is worthless.
421 posted on 03/09/2002 8:55:34 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Look what has happened to the Mexican economy now that we have sent a bunch of corporations down there to pump them up. Nada, no improvement unless you count the rake off by the Mexican elite and the workers trying to unionize for higher pay.

I use to think it would be a good idea to build the Mexican economy, but now I see it as a black money sucking hole. Mexico is America's Palestine with the corrupt government it has in place. Illegal Mexicans will not improve our lot, rather bring our country's wage down to their level. If you think the "New World Order" is going to be some workers paradise, that old prostitute has been around a long time.

The insanity involved in tying our security to Mexico's cooperation regarding it's borders, seaports, and airports is beyond comprehension. I'm sure you will grasp the horror of that fact after palms are crossed with a little cash, that first nuke is smuggled across the border and you are busy trying to put your childrens skin back on them.

422 posted on 03/09/2002 8:55:48 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Dane
You apparently think that President Fox has a certain authority over the American government and that he can dictate our immigration laws and he can tell us if we are to have a one-way border of not. Why didn't Fox do the same for those Cuban refugees who went to the Mexican embassy to seek asylum? Can't you see Fox is the biggest lying hypocrit around?
423 posted on 03/09/2002 9:01:39 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Huh then America should have been dead long ago when poor illiterate immigrants from Europe swarmed the US a hundred years ago.

That's pretty much when we started on the slippery slope to Socialism.....when we imported people who brought in Socialist unions to gain control of our government.

424 posted on 03/09/2002 9:04:20 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Dane will never criticize anything Bush proposes.
425 posted on 03/09/2002 9:05:09 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Would you agree to letting the Prime Minister of Canada dictate that we were to allow every Canadian full access to every job, every social program, every resource in the United States but that Americans were not to be given rights to Canadian jobs and resources?
426 posted on 03/09/2002 9:06:32 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Dane will never criticize anything Bush proposes.

More likely never criticize anything Fox proposes.

427 posted on 03/09/2002 9:07:30 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Truthsayer20
I actually once witnessed an anti-Mexican zealot confessing that he had voted against the initiative ending bilingual education in California. His reasoning was that knowledge of English would make the "brown cockroaches" more acceptable to Whites and make their deportation more difficult.

That is not surprising.

428 posted on 03/09/2002 9:08:05 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Is there a difference? Both are looking after the interests of Mexico.
429 posted on 03/09/2002 9:10:16 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Would you agree to letting the Prime Minister of Canada dictate that we were to allow every Canadian full access to every job, every social program, every resource in the United States but that Americans were not to be given rights to Canadian jobs and resources?

Where has it been said that every Mexican citizen gets an entitlement?

430 posted on 03/09/2002 9:12:32 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I will not vote for him again, so I hope he can give enough of the Mexican's the vote .He will need them!

And you call yourself Christian? God has a special place for people like you that hate others the way you seem to exhibit here.

431 posted on 03/09/2002 9:14:15 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: Dane
In case you didn't hear about this ---look how Fox is when it comes to true political refugees:

HAVANA · Responding to a request from the Mexican ambassador, Fidel Castro early Friday morning approved orders for police to evict 21 young Cuban men from the Mexican Embassy, bringing a swift end to a potentially tense diplomatic standoff.

The Cubans, who had commandeered a city bus two days earlier and crashed through the embassy's gate, were sleeping in the library when 42 unarmed special forces officers entered the diplomatic compound about 4:30 a.m. Within six minutes they were all loaded onto awaiting buses and driven away.

"Most of them left very passively. It was really very, very quiet," said Ambassador Ricardo Pascoe Pierce, who witnessed the men's removal. He repeated the Mexican government's position that the men, who ranged in age from 16 to 38, did not seek political asylum or show evidence of persecution.

"Our sense was that they were adventurers who wanted to get a visa and a plane ticket," he said. "My impression is that they were duped. … We're not willing to let our embassy become a victim in an action that is very unclear in its origin."

Pascoe Pierce and a highly placed Cuban official said they did not know where the men were being held or what charges they face. Pascoe Pierce said the minors might be released.

Mexican officials repeatedly had asked the men to leave the embassy. When they didn't, Mexico asked the Cuban government to intervene. Only an hour before the pre-dawn eviction, during a meeting with Castro and Foreign Minister Felipe Perez Roque, Pascoe Pierce said he discussed the "pros and cons of the action."

432 posted on 03/09/2002 9:14:24 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
Doesn't he realize that his goals to help the poor will only turn around and drag everyone down?

If Bush wants to help the poor, why doesn't he help poor Americans? This massive invasion harms not only our poor but the middle class as well. The guy has a screw loose somewhere if he's more concerned with Mexicans than Americans. To hell with the poor Mexicans, let Vicente Fox take care of them. I'm fed up with this BS. The more I read on this subject, the more and more I dislike Bush.

433 posted on 03/09/2002 9:14:41 AM PST by Eddie Haskell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
That's pretty much when we started on the slippery slope to Socialism.....when we imported people who brought in Socialist unions to gain control of our government.

LOL! With a screen name like Fitz that statement is quite ironic.

434 posted on 03/09/2002 9:15:50 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: Dane
They want rights to the entitlements ---that's the only thing being illegal denies them. You still didn't answer if the Prime Minister of Canada can insist that every Canadian have access to the entire US economy but not the reverse.
435 posted on 03/09/2002 9:16:44 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Dane
You'll see lots of ironies ---I know many Hispanics who don't believe in open borders or rewarding law-breakers with amnesty ---especially those who made the effort to immigrate legally. I don't believe the Irish should be allowed to break our immigration laws either.
436 posted on 03/09/2002 9:18:24 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: Dane
You are so wrong. You haven't answered the true questions that I present to you. Furthermore, the overwhelming majority of Ellis Island arrivals wanted nothing more than to be Americans. That's not the same as with the people from Mexico.

Let me tell you about a friend of mine, a coworker that is. He is an immigrant from the south of Brazil, who emigrated here, legally, last year. He is fluent in English, was an engineer in Brazil. He came from the south Brazilian city of Uberlandia.

His "rants" are much the same as mine. He wonders why the Mexicans don't want to learn English, become Americans, etc. His statement to me was, "they don't want to learn English".

He has two daughters of whom can now speak fluent English after living in the U.S. for seven months. Sometimes they'll come into the workplace, and I've on occassions seen at least one of his daughters wearing an American flag t-shirt. In the back of my coworkers car, he has an American flag, and he came to America so that his daughters could have a better life. You might say, "well, that's what the Mexicans are doing". You're right, most are. However, illegals, as well as a majority of Mexicans, in my opinion, are different in that they have no desire to be Americans. Unlike my coworker, whose goal was also to be an American, many Mexicans do not share this trait.

One thing about his daughers, he tells me, is that when they came to America, they were placed in (ESL) English as a Second Language classes. He indicated that he did not want them to be in there for very long, for he wanted them speaking English and in classes with the American kids. Within a couple of months, their English had improved to such an extent that they were placed in regular classes. Furthermore, they're making A's and B's.

I once spoke with his daughter, and she claimed that most of the students in the ESL classes were Mexican. Futhermore, she told me that many of them had been there before she arrived, and that many had yet to learn very much English. She was saying that it was as if they didn't want to learn the language.

Again, this is just an example.

Now, I would like you to answer my questions?
1) Do you support illegal immigration?
2) Do you believe that rewarding illegal behavior is okay?
3) From where in the country do you reside?
4) Do you profit from and, or, are you related to any illegal aliens?

437 posted on 03/09/2002 9:18:27 AM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
In many Georgia counties, Mexicans make up five to ten percent of the population. In a few, they make up as much as twenty percent of the population. However, ten years ago, there wasn't a county in the state that had a Mexican (Hispanic) population greater than four percent. Now, this isn't because they're legal. Most of them are illegal and have broken our borders. Furthermore, we have a governor who has asked President Bush for more illegals. He claims that they've kept the economy alive. How naieve, doesn't he realize that it's a time bomb waiting to explode?

Keep your eye on Saxby Chambliss come Tuesday when the 245i vote happens. He has big plans on becoming senator in November. If he votes for this (which I think he will) it needs to be brought to the attention of all the citizens of our state. If he wins the primary this proud southerner will be sitting out the senate race on election day.

As for King Roy, what do you expect??????? He and all the good ole boy Dems who control this state are bought and paid for by big business interests from out of state. Always has been, and always will be unless people stop being obsessed with their mundane, materialistic personal lives.

438 posted on 03/09/2002 9:19:22 AM PST by GaConfed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Well you should have agreed with Fox with your anti-immigrant rehtoric

These poor illiterate Cubans would have just come to the US and be more of a burden on our society, according to your rhetoric.

I am surprised that you aren't congratulating Fox.

439 posted on 03/09/2002 9:19:45 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I guess refusing the Cubans political asylum was okay in your book. Even while at the same time, Fox is demanding something far different from the Americans. And for 8 million not 21 individuals.
440 posted on 03/09/2002 9:21:23 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 2,941-2,945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson