Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo doubts he can block amnesty-extension bill
Denver Post ^ | March 8, 2002 | Bill McAllister

Posted on 03/08/2002 1:24:33 PM PST by sarcasm

Friday, March 08, 2002 - WASHINGTON - Rep. Tom Tancredo takes credit for thwarting the Bush administration's last effort to offer partial amnesty to thousands of illegal residents, but Thursday the outspoken immigration foe said he may have been outmaneuvered by the White House.

President Bush has struck a deal with the House leadership to place legislation that offers an extension of amnesty on its consent calendar before Bush heads to Mexico for a state visit next week, the Colorado Republican said.

That action should ensure quick House passage of legislation that Bush has repeatedly sought from Congress. It would allow an undocumented person to receive legal standing, such as a valid green card, by filing a declaration with the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

It presumably also would require the person to have been in the United States by a certain date and have filed a declaration with the INS from an appropriate sponsor, such as a relative or employer, and pay a $1,000 penalty.

"The terms are still up in the air," said Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration, a group that has been allied with Tancredo. "We've heard to the effect that the president wants something to bring down to Mexico."

The initial Bush proposal, designed exclusively for Mexicans, once was high on the president's legislative wish list, but it was delayed after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11. However, as the president noted Wednesday in a speech to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, he now is pushing for the extension of the amnesty program known by the section of immigration law that covers it, Section 245I.

The president hailed it as a way to reunite family, separated by the border. "If you believe in family values, if you understand the worth of family and the importance of family, let's get 245I out of the United States Congress and give me a chance to sign it," Bush told the chamber members.

Tancredo, the head of a congressional caucus on immigration issues and proponent of halting virtually all immigration, said he had blocked a previous attempt by Bush to push an extension of the amnesty program through the House. But this time, he said House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., had agreed to place the issue on the suspension, or consent, calendar, making it difficult to defeat the proposal.

The Senate might be more favorable to the bill than the House, expanding the numbers of individuals who can apply, Tancredo said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freetrade; hughhewitt; immigrantlist; nwo; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,421-2,4402,441-2,4602,461-2,480 ... 2,941-2,945 next last
To: Egg
Everyone who used the correct legal channels to immigrate here and their sponsors should file a class action lawsuit against the US government (INS) for a refund of both filing fees and attorney's fees. If we can't make them listen to us, we'll force their hand.

This is the PERFECT Revolt! This is a very strong achilles heel for Presidente Bush y Fox and their dastardly plans. How could the President counter the angry claims of those who spent a lot of money and time to go through the line in an orderly fashion LEGALLY; Class Action Suit! Great Idea!

Bush goes to the end of the line, and, taking them by the hand, lets his 'friends' cut through to the front for their ice cream, ignoring all the others who queued up in order and under the rules. How can Bush be 'ANGRY' at the INS today over the issuance of visas to terrorists post facto. He himself views the who INS process and federal law as a farce.

Get this brilliant idea to Tancredo!

2,441 posted on 03/13/2002 7:50:49 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2199 | View Replies]

To: Vallandigham
Put my name on the list.

Add my family's 30 votes to those the Republicans have lost in future elections.

2,442 posted on 03/13/2002 7:56:22 AM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2410 | View Replies]

To: Semaphore Heathcliffe
I voted for him too. But after Ron Paul did what he did in this case I don't know if I can stand to support them any more. I mean the only guy we have up there is voting to give my taxes away to more illegals (whether they're called illegal or not) and he knows it. I'm just pissed and am starting to look for another alternative.

EBUCK

2,443 posted on 03/13/2002 8:04:20 AM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2394 | View Replies]

Comment #2,444 Removed by Moderator

To: sarcasm
BTTT
2,445 posted on 03/13/2002 8:25:47 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Egg
That's it?! Nearly 2,400 posts from irate people who care about their country, and all you can say is "at least Bush isn't Clinton."?! Talk about pathetic shillery, indeed!

Agree, some of these pro-illegal alien responses are painfully pathetic!

2,446 posted on 03/13/2002 8:26:15 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2411 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
I am disappointed in Ron Paul, but realize that Ron Paul is nothing but a libertarian serving in the House under the Republican banner. Mr. Paul has now shown himself to be nothing but a two-faced hypocrite, since he has always bragged in the past that he is the only one in the House voting against ideas like a proclamation day for Peanuts creator Charles Schultz upon his death and the naming of Ronald Reagan Airport. After his so-called stance on these things, he turns around and pulls this crap. But then again, he is nothing but a libertarian serving falsely under the Republican banner, and Libertarians generally favor open borders without restrictions.
2,447 posted on 03/13/2002 8:26:19 AM PST by jragan2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2443 | View Replies]

Comment #2,448 Removed by Moderator

To: Old Hickory
In Texas for 2003 I read that the next school year will have a majority of minority students for their state public school system. And they have two Hispanics debating in Spanish for the governor's race right? So... when in Rome... well you get the idea.

Coming to a neighborhood near you soon.....

2,449 posted on 03/13/2002 8:46:01 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2448 | View Replies]

To: jragan2001
You're right, they generally do (myself excluded) but that policy is susposed to go hand in hand with the idea that we, as tax-payers, would not be required to support the immigrants. That is key. The reason I want the borders closed is because I pay too much in taxes already. Add between 4 and 64 million (the estimates posted here) to my tax burder and I'm thru, I can't support my family under a 60% tax burden. These people will now be able to apply for all sorts of assistance legally. Mark my words, we are going to go into massive debt over this.

EBUCK

2,450 posted on 03/13/2002 8:46:49 AM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2447 | View Replies]

To: healey22
Same story at RNC. Normally I get right through. Had to leave a message today. Tried four times.

Let's see: last night Bill O'Reilly castigated it; so did Alan Keyes, who managed to muzzle steve moore, whose only debating tactic is to start screaming in the middle of someone else being perfectly rational - in this, Tom Tancredo.

Tancredo did really well in both cases - intelligent, reasonable, restrained - the other guys had no answer for "why are you rewarding criminals?" other than the lame "well, they're here now".

Senator Tancredo. Nice ring, huh?

2,451 posted on 03/13/2002 8:47:19 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2440 | View Replies]

To: jragan2001
Class Action Suit against the Federal Government on behalf of LEGAL IMMIGRANTS who entered the United States by following the rules of the Republic out of respect for the United States and Rule of Law.

There is not a LEGAL IMMIGRANT around who did not incur costs such as medical tests, police background tests, time off work, interviews at consulates, lawyers fees, fedexes, visa fees, international phone calls, photocopies, stamps, photos, etc. in preparation for legally coming to the United States.

There must be millions of them.

There must be a move to start a massive CLASS ACTION SUIT by LEGAL IMMIGRANTS to recover their costs in an effort to oppose the carte blanche for illegals which Bush and House Dems and GOPs granted yesterday.

This will pull the rug out from under the White House and pro-illegal immigration allies in the House.

There is no logical or strong argument that could ever counter the angry claim made by these LEGAL IMMIGRANTS. Please, some Congressman or Senator step up to the plate!

2,452 posted on 03/13/2002 8:48:10 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2447 | View Replies]

Comment #2,453 Removed by Moderator

To: Regulator
Let's see: last night Bill O'Reilly castigated it; so did Alan Keyes, who managed to muzzle steve moore, whose only debating tactic is to start screaming in the middle of someone else being perfectly rational - in this, Tom Tancredo.

I've been listening to Rush for the last 15 minutes or so and he has been talking about this and seems pretty negative on it. Said something earlier about it being very dangerous (security wise). And now just said it was morally wrong and politically wrong. He had a couple of calls on it, one definitely negative and the other mostly negative.

2,454 posted on 03/13/2002 9:14:46 AM PST by bam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2451 | View Replies]

Comment #2,455 Removed by Moderator

To: EBUCK
bttt
2,456 posted on 03/13/2002 9:17:34 AM PST by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2450 | View Replies]

To: JJDKII
President Tancredo has a nice melodic ring to it.
2,457 posted on 03/13/2002 9:30:13 AM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2455 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
How about Pres. Tancredo. Sounds good to me. He'll never get past the Rino's for a shot at the seat but it sounds nice.

EBUCK

2,458 posted on 03/13/2002 9:42:14 AM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2451 | View Replies]

To: Vallandigham
He admitted during the course of the interview that he was in Washington. Yet he couldn't get to the capitol to vote last night? If you had voted "NO", Van, the bill would have FAILED! Do I understand that properly? If there had been ONE MORE "NO" VOTE, this amnesty bill would NOT have passed? I want confirmation on this, before I go off on this radio host for not following up on this with Hilleary. By the way; Hilleary is running for governor of Tennessee, and probably does not want conservatives to find out that he "allowed" this bill to pass

I hope we as Americans in trouble, can count on Tennessee freepers to make sure the voters know this, by showing up at all his public speaking engagements and freeping him with his uncaring and unseemly behaviour. Tie this legislation around his neck like an arbatross.

2,459 posted on 03/13/2002 9:57:59 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2444 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
You may ask him yourself with my permission.
And you may donate the $20 to FR. Thanks for helping the cause.
2,460 posted on 03/13/2002 10:04:00 AM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2421 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,421-2,4402,441-2,4602,461-2,480 ... 2,941-2,945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson