Posted on 03/08/2002 1:24:33 PM PST by sarcasm
Brownie74 has indicated he/she believes Bush is dead set wanting this....I believe likewise...to the point of being a 1 timer like the old man....
That said, isn't it interesting that Phil (not over my dead body) Gramm and Dick Armey, both power houses from Texas have opted not to fight the battle against Bush by running again....seems like that should tell people something...it's common knowledge, you don't support the party, or the President and you're done.....I believe the handwriting was on the bathroom wall....
As I just posted on another thread, Phil Gramm says he is against amnesty but for a guest workers program. I think Gramm will go against 245(i). I hope so anyway.
Following your line of logic, that would be a good way for Gramm and Armey to get a last jab in at Bush.
I really believe he doesn't care about re-election. Look at the Progress his behind the scenes guys are making toward their goals.
There is usually an assumption that a Politician CRAVES a second term. Jr. is Probably Craving to get out. This is a real chore to him.
The consolidations necessary will occur regardless of which party is in office, and now it doesn't even slow down because a Repub is in the Presidency.
It is an insult to all of us, immigrants no less than natives, to suggest that America degenerate into some form of undifferentiated humanity. A nation is not a game of muscial chairs. It is about heritage, and shared experiences, over generations. Suffering those who broke our laws--and in effect denied our right to control our own borders and communities--to come here, to remain, hardly makes any sense. I cannot understand why a basically decent, Conservative and moral man, like the President, seems to have a blind spot on this. (See Immigration & The American Future.)
William Flax
The nature of the dysron is that he does not really think. He reacts in his compulsions in response to an imagined reality that simply does not exist. The man totally misunderstands how people are wrapped psychologically, and is very dangerous in his analytic ineptitude. For the lessons we all should have learned from 2000, see Politics 2001--Lessons 2000.
Rove's idea of strategy, if the near disaster that he orchestrated in 2000 is any clue, are on the same level as the Liberal Arts Sociology Major, at Harvard or Columbia, who actually believes the propaganda of the department. He has no place advising anyone seriously seeking to understand American politics.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
When I asked her if there was any other kind of bill that had to do with Amnesty or immigrant tracking she said the only bill that came close was Bill #1885. This bill is called "Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Act". Does anyone know if congress has renamed #245I to #1885 or have delayed action on 245I?
Thanks Regulator.
What is your argument? Why do you support the destruction of America? Where is your common sense? I'm serious. Are you a Mexican or "Hispanic", and do you think the law doesn't apply to people of Mexican or "Hispanic" heritage? Just curious.
My comment was not the Rove was some sort of "true believer." The term dysron, which I have coined, refers to one who has normal, or maybe above average intelligence, but is only able to analyze factors at a moronic level, because of fears and compulsions that dominate his perception--or baffle his reasoning. Rove may have succumbed to a malady that is very common among those attending the "Liberal Arts" programs at prestige Universities. He may actually believe that the myths, deliberately spread by such Fabian propagandists as Ashley Montagu and Gordon Allport, in the last Century, represent reality. And that an undifferentiated humanity is the wave of the future. (See Myths & Myth Makers In American "Higher" Education.)
The typical student who acquires this mindset is the one who is just not quite smart enough to see the obvious errors in the analysis offered, and being impressed (in the vernacular "snowed") by the poseurs on campus, lacks the confidence to even question anything that they profess. He therefore operates under a misunderstanding of reality from the outset.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
Is an outcome where the President ignores what is right for the Country acceptable to you just because said President has an "R" by their name....does the "R" stand for right, as in the correct or proper thing to do?
Last August, I believe was the date, Alan Keyes made a comment about it being easier to see and fight the known enemy (he was talking about the Perverted President)...our eyes are open to 'the other side' doing things whereas when its one us 'ours' running the show, we tend to let our eyes glaze over, or just go out and plant a garden knowing everything is gonna be ok cause our guys doing it.
The last scenario has been running rampant here at FR....
Yah, lotta shutters closed to the truth here'bouts.
EBUCK
PLYLER v. DOE, 457 U.S. 202 (1982)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.