As a matter of fact, the sequence shown IS the entire video. The plane was going too fast to be photographed between frames. The video surveillance camera apparently takes about 100 pictures a second, if these five sequential pictures were taken in 4/100ths of a second, according to the story.
The first frame shows no plane crash; the second frame, taken at about 1/100th of a second later, shows the explosion.
So the plane traversed the entire field of view of the camera between the first and second frames in less than 1/100th of a second.
This does not seem possible. I tend to think that the story is in error and the camera possibly takes only 60 pictures a minute (one per second). This would leave a full second for the plane to cross the entire field of view without being photographed. I' m not sure at what speed the plane would have to be flying to accomplish that.