Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomB
I asked for a picture because I wanted to see one..Duh!

No one up to this point, including you, has given us a picture.

Your contention is what? Inceration? Vaporization?

203 posted on 03/07/2002 5:07:16 PM PST by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: It'salmosttolate
No one up to this point, including you, has given us a picture

If you look at the video in post 194, you can clearly see a blurred object coming in just behind that toll box. If it's not a plane, I can't possibly imagine what else it could be. Tin foil hats should be removed by this time...

206 posted on 03/07/2002 5:10:37 PM PST by dubyagee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

To: It'salmosttolate
Your contention is what? Inceration? Vaporization?

Look, this shouldn't be that hard to follow.

We are discussing, for the purposes of example 2 plane crashes. One in the Pentagon (allegedly, for your sake), and Shanksville, PA.

You claim that because of the fact that no tail section was recovered from the Pentagon, it wasn't a plane that caused the explosion.

I then post a picture of the Shanksville crash in which the impact crater is visible, yet there is also no tail section there.

It should be obvious then, that similar planes, with similar fuel loads, going similar speeds, would appear similar when they crash, i.e., no large pieces of debris.

That is the essence of my argument. I mentioned eyewitnesses elsewhere, but that has no bearing on this discussion.

210 posted on 03/07/2002 5:25:45 PM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson