Obviously, considering the fact that you keep changing the topic, you don't have a leg to stand on. But I try to get the discussion back on track anyway.
You asked for a picture of the tail section of the plane that crashed into the Pentagon, implying that since there was none, no plane had crashed there. I then posted a picture of the Shanksville crash site, where a similar plane had crashed. That picture showed no tail section either. I then asked if you were ready to say that a plane didn't crash in Shanksville because there was no tail section.
Now, is that what you are saying?
You said numorous "witnesses" saw it. I didn't say ANYTHING about it NOT crashing. I just followed your logic applying it to Flight 800 where upwards of 100 witnesses saw what they described as a missle hitting it.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Do you believe that the 800 flight was shot down by a missle like the "witnesses" reported....
... or do we have a case where "TomB decides when witnesses are telling the truth."?