[It'salmosttolate]

We, everyone else was talking about the pentagon crash. YOU changed the subject to the Penn crash. Yes or NO?

You said numorous "witnesses" saw it. I didn't say ANYTHING about it NOT crashing. I just followed your logic applying it to Flight 800 where upwards of 100 witnesses saw what they described as a missle hitting it.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Do you believe that the 800 flight was shot down by a missle like the "witnesses" reported....

... or do we have a case where "TomB decides when witnesses are telling the truth."?

[michigander]

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

I'll vouch for that!

[TomB]

I'll ask again. If the fact that there was no visible tail section at the Pentagon prove that no plane crashed there, does the fact that there is no visible tail section in Shanksville prove that a plane didn't crash there?

Well? Did a plane crash in Shanksville or not?