[Nebullis]

It isn't flawless.

Right. (That's one of the reasons we see evolution.)

[Southack]

So now you are finally agreeing that we do not see a 100% expected rate of the propagation of mutations, after dancing around claiming otherwise for a small number of posts.

But you spoil even that intellectual breakthrough by then claiming that seeing mere mutations (which you've already agreed don't always propagate even when beneficial) is the same as seeing evidence of evolution.

You've got to have mutations propagating successfully before a species can evolve.