No, I'm actually a technical expert on digital logic and can easily recognize unscientific obfuscations on this subject when I see them.
Human computer software programming is entirely analogous to genetic DNA coding. It's a fact. It's backed by numerous supporting elements, too.
For instance, DNA stores data, processes data, and replicates itself. Likewise, human computer programming stores data, processes data, and replicates itself.
Nothing else in the universe does that. That makes for a pretty rarified association (and hence, analogy).
When DNA is processing data or code, external environmental variables/inputs affect the final output. Likewise, when human computer programs are processing data or code, external environmental variables/inputs affect the final output.
Genetic DNA code has subroutines known as "genes" that we see re-used in various species. Likewise, human computer programming code has subroutines that we see re-used in various other programs.
You would be hard-pressed to show a SINGLE behavior by either DNA or human software that isn't performed at some level by the other.
You can pretend that I'm blind, but that isn't going to improve your argument.
Contrary to your unsupportable claim, human computer programs really are analogous to genetic DNA code.