Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
Sure, you could build a double-helix DNA structure with all A/C bases in between acids, but that would be incapable of forming life because there would be no data present.

Any sequence of DNA will be active. There's no such thing as a "blank" sequence of DNA. The activity of the sequence will depend on the molecules in the environment around it. But each base, each atom, no matter what sequence it is in, is active with properties peculiar to it.

577 posted on 04/05/2002 8:36:43 AM PST by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies ]


To: Nebullis
"Any sequence of DNA will be active. There's no such thing as a "blank" sequence of DNA. The activity of the sequence will depend on the molecules in the environment around it. But each base, each atom, no matter what sequence it is in, is active with properties peculiar to it."

Rubbish. If you are attempting to say anything more substantive than "chemicals react with each other," then that implies that EVERY possible iteration of DNA is capable of forming sustainable living beings. You could pour acids and bases into a test tube in every junior high science class in the world and create random, new life forms on demand if that was even remotely true.

It isn't. I can physically form a double-helix structure at home or work, but that doesn't mean that said structure is viable DNA. Likewise, I can physically melt and mold a CD-ROM from scratch, but that doesn't mean that data is automatically valid on it.

578 posted on 04/05/2002 8:59:17 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson