No, I'm not.
What chaotic environment are you talking about? Why don't you address the points you've been asked to address before? Why is it you keep ignoring the solid refutations you've been given?
The math HAS been refuted. It is a mathematical excercise with no real relationship to the actual arguments of DNA formation. DNA formation was not random, it was a self-organizing process. Nobody argues that a bunch of molecules just happened to stick together to form the first DNA, and that simple fact means this math has no relevance. Deal with it.
1. The math hasn't been refuted.
2. No one has ever documented a single case of DNA self-organizing without the aid of intelligence (or existing life).
3. Lot's of athiests and agnostics argue that random molecules just happened to stick together to form the first DNA chain.
Contrary to your absurd claims, the math in this thread is relevant because it factually calculates the odds of DNA self-organizing without any form of Intelligent Intervention (i.e., in a chaotic environment).
Show me an example of that happening or else admit that your claim is an unsubstantiated opinion instead of "science".
No example = Opinion.