[mlo]

I can't speak for the author of the math, but I for one could accept your point that it indicates a non-random cause.

Excellent. Now you need to understand that natural processes are rarely random. They sometimes have random components, but the only purely random events in nature that I can think of happen in quantum physics.

Do yourself a favor and read up on self-organizing systems.

[Southack]

"Do yourself a favor and read up on self-organizing systems."

Click on my profile and note the books that I praise.

[Southack]

"Excellent. Now you need to understand that natural processes are rarely random. They sometimes have random components, but the only purely random events in nature that I can think of happen in quantum physics." - mlo

So would a non-random process capable of producing useful, sequential data appear more like an intelligent process or a non-intelligent (AKA "natural") process?