Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Physicist
You are now arguing that because said speciation event was not "natural", that it doesn't count. - Southack

"No, I'm arguing that because that ability arose in the 20th century, it is unable to explain the speciation that occurred prior to the 20th century." -Physicist

OK, this is progress. Now you are implying that the only problem with my example completely refuting for all time the Theory of Evolution is: timing.

Can we now agree that Intelligent Design has been demonstrated and will refute Evolution (and send it packing its bags for the land of scientifically discredited theories) if your timing concern is dealt with adequately?

327 posted on 03/08/2002 10:21:12 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
Can we now agree that Intelligent Design has been demonstrated and will refute Evolution

No, and this has been answered before. Why is it that you never digest the answers you're given and go on repeating things that have been shown to be false? Are you not interested in the truth?

The fact that genetic engineering now occuurs does not mean that it did in the past.

Even if there were agents capable of performing genetic engineering in the past (a completely hypothetical statement) that would not mean the they were in fact responsible for evolutionary change.

It would not invalidate natural selection. Only an inability to think logically allows one to think so. Both natural selection and genetic engineering can exist. Your argument is based on the premise that they can't, which is absurd.

329 posted on 03/08/2002 10:31:34 AM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson