[cracker]

So someone must prove that a Creator exists before you'll accept that Evolution can be falsified?

NO, someone should present me with evidence of a creator before I'll admit that creationism is a viable explanation. No creator (or designer), no creation (no design). That's your burden.

Evolution is an independent matter. As I said - they are not mutually exclusive. And evolution could be disproven and replaced with another scientific theory, and that would still not prove creationism.

[Southack]

I can show you a physical example, repeatable in any lab in the world and occurring here in the USA on a daily basis, of speciation that occurs non-naturally.

Are you prepared to stand by your claim above that this example will falsify Evolutionary Theory? - Southack

"What? your "example" is NOT a disproof. I did not say that all you had to show was that speciation CAN occur without natural selection. ... Do you even know what falisification means? ... I suggest you try offering evidence that a creator sufficient to have designed and created all living species (and the fossil evidence, etc.) exists." - cracker

So someone must prove that a Creator exists before you'll accept that Evolution can be falsified? - Southack

"NO, someone should present me with evidence of a creator before I'll admit that creationism is a viable explanation. No creator (or designer), no creation (no design). That's your burden.

"Evolution is an independent matter. As I said - they are not mutually exclusive." - cracker

So tell me again why my non-Creator, physical lab example isn't sufficient to falsify Evolution for you...