NO, someone should present me with evidence of a creator before I'll admit that creationism is a viable explanation. No creator (or designer), no creation (no design). That's your burden.
Evolution is an independent matter. As I said - they are not mutually exclusive. And evolution could be disproven and replaced with another scientific theory, and that would still not prove creationism.
Are you prepared to stand by your claim above that this example will falsify Evolutionary Theory? - Southack
"What? your "example" is NOT a disproof. I did not say that all you had to show was that speciation CAN occur without natural selection. ... Do you even know what falisification means? ... I suggest you try offering evidence that a creator sufficient to have designed and created all living species (and the fossil evidence, etc.) exists." - cracker
So someone must prove that a Creator exists before you'll accept that Evolution can be falsified? - Southack
"NO, someone should present me with evidence of a creator before I'll admit that creationism is a viable explanation. No creator (or designer), no creation (no design). That's your burden."Evolution is an independent matter. As I said - they are not mutually exclusive." - cracker
So tell me again why my non-Creator, physical lab example isn't sufficient to falsify Evolution for you...