That's incorrect. It's axiomatic that some data could form arise by chance.
The claim is that large amounts of precise sequencing of data can not mathematically arise by chance in the 17 Billion years of our known universe.
The claim is that large amounts of precise sequencing of data can not mathematically arise by chance in the 17 Billion years of our known universe.
Glad we agree that some data can emerge un-aided.
The next issue, however, is your description of "large". What is "large" - refering back to JennyP's discussion of a 32-mer self-replicating peptide chain. Is that too large? I really wish you'd give us some way to quantify these numbers.
And, of course, it's all still a strawman because nobody argues that DNA arose "by chance" - there have been selection pressures at work since the earliest days, a fact you have yet to address.