Carter single handedly destablaized the whole middle-east by undercutting the Shah.
Today we have Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon (occupied by Syria), and Saudi Arabia focusing their attention on Israel. In the old days they had to wonder what the Shah would do. Would he enter a conflict due to his relations with the US?
Carter screwed the pooch in Iran, Panama, North Korea and other South American countries as well. He felt that it was a bad idea to keep up relations with "bad guys" around the world. Generally his undercutting of "bad guys" brought in worse bad guys as examplified by Iran.
No President should have his policies undercut by former chief executives. I believe a certain amount of overview by Congress is apporpriate, but it should NEVER reach the level of partisainship.
Carter, Dasshole and others need to allow Bush to conduct foreign policy. When he makes a mistake, that's the time to question his policies. So far he's doing a good job.
I'd be interested to know what Dasshole thinks he would handle differently than Bush. So far all I see is carping. It must be really eating him that Bush has approval raitings in the strosphere.
I dont think we could have stopped a revolution if the people truly wanted a change in government, with or without support..