"And this is a non sequitur." - Dan Day
What?! How can you claim that my statement above is off subject? What makes it a non sequitur, specificly?
"And this is a non sequitur." - Dan Day
What?! How can you claim that my statement above is off subject? What makes it a non sequitur, specificly?
Because it drags the topic to an irrelevancy, away from the key points being discussed.
The fact that the author failed to introduce *any* sort of feedback mechanism into his calculation is a fatal flaw if he's even remotely trying to model abiogenesis. And since it's *missing* any feedback whatsoever, the exact nature of any hypothetical "added" feedback is an exercise in mental masturbation.
It's like arguing over whether a man with no legs should be wearing loafers or hiking boots.