[Southack]

"But those encryption systems may well turn out to be crackable using quantum mechanic processes which are not limited by the conventional multiplication of probabilities. Therefore, the multiplying together of probabilities to get numbers so small that they cannot occur within the size and age of our universe fails as a method of proof."

Inventing a great hyper-computer in the future does not invalidate known mathematical proofs today.

[dpwiener]

Inventing a great hyper-computer in the future does not invalidate known mathematical proofs today.

Look, the point is that the "mathematical proof against evolution" in this article is not a valid mathematical proof. The theory of evolution may be right or it may be wrong. And there may be other methods of proving that it is either right or wrong. But this isn't a valid method.