Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Will_Kansas
"Uh, actually no, what I said wasn't nonsense. ANY CODE CAN BE MODIFIED, IF THERE IS A WILL TO DO SO."

Sure, whatever. Hell, someone can take "Hello World!" and edit into an ICBM guidance control system. But I think most normal, reasonable people would not consider that a "modification of a program".

By the same token, it is utter nonsense to suggest that Windows can be disemboweled and made into something it's not. Do you grasp the "stuff" that's at various times been called OLE2, ActiveX, COM, and so forth? Do you understand that various components have various dependencies, and that to attempt to "surgically" rebuild the OS to some court's spec would result in a nightmare beyond comprehension -- and, a product no one would want? All at a cost no one would pay?

141 posted on 03/05/2002 3:37:02 PM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Don Joe
By the same token, it is utter nonsense to suggest that Windows can be disemboweled

I have never said that removing IE would be easy. My 25 years of programming experience (which you so casually dismissed since it suited your purpose) has shown me that it would probably be a painful experience to do so. But, it could be done.

My problem with Microsoft's statement that it can't be done is this: I have never heard them say that the re-programming effort would be too great, or too expensive. That led me to believe that they simply don't want to. For that reason, I believe their statement to be disingenuous.

Okay, I've had my say. Flame away. Your flames won't be returned, as I don't need them to make my point.

159 posted on 03/06/2002 5:53:10 AM PST by Will_Kansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson