Posted on 03/04/2002 4:28:19 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:00:12 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Declaring it was not the job of Congress to "rubber-stamp" the president's priorities, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle insisted Sunday that the Bush administration must keep Congress better informed of its plans for the war on terrorism.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Congress ought to just sit down and shut up until they can get their own damn houses in order.
Dashcle has not done his job since 9/11 and I for one want to encourage him and all of the democrats, especially those up for re-election, to be way more vocal about this.
When Daschle was carefully questioned yesterday on FNS, his answers seemed disingenous at best and his position hostile for the sake of political gain. If he cannot offer any more rational arguments for his "questions" then he looks like a naysayer for the sake of naysaying. That is fair too. A war against an often unknown and shadowy enemy will not neccesarily proceed to a quick and tidy end, and Daschle appears either too stupid to understand this or crassly partisan.(pick one). Frankly his only complaint was that he wasn't informed enough and his stupid reply to Snow that he didn't ask the president directly when he met with him, because he only learned later that day that he didn't know much was pretty pathetic. Daschle sounded like a whiner and it was not a good day for his case. His position was analagous to say Columbus crossing the Ocean to find India. If he had decided about midway across that he didn't really know where he was going even tho he had made great progress,and turned back because he hadn't found land, history would have recorded that as failure of nerve. That is what Daschle looks like if regarded in the kindest light, but of course, he is not experiencing a failure of nerve at all, he is simply trying to breed doubt and fear, for political gain. That is his right. It is the opppositions right to call him on it.
regards
It was run by politicians for policitians who had no interest in winning on the battlefield and you and Daschle are endorsing a return to that time honored tradition.
Is that what you want? Congressional committees and LBJ consulting o what targets to hit? Those are "operational details".
Comprende'?
Yes, a once per week meeting to get an update is hardly enough. Maybe he should be given veto power over every decision.
But the important thing isn't the information. The key is that Dashle needs to convey all of our insecurities and feelings of weakness and lack of direction to all of the American people. This is stuff the American people need to know about their leaders. They need to know which leaders are ones that can make and implement battle plans and which ones have no clue.
And doesn't it bug you that members of the House and Senate are allowed access to classified info that other people have to undergo backround checks to see? And don't you ever wonder if someone, or maybe a few someones, among those 535 people is doing something unsavory with that info?
regards
We must give him so room to develop this idea of being critical of a president at war. Its not easy to do because so few poltico's have done it in the past. I have faith that the American people will see the spirit in which Dashcle is offering his critical analysis and will come to appreciate him as much as we Freepers do.
If Daschle is not kept in the loop, it is because he is a despicable liar and people in his caucus have proven themselves hostile to national security secrets (ie, Leahy et. al.).
I do hope your right. Daschle has been disappointing in that each time he seems to be taking a stand, he drops it and moves to something new. First the tax cut, then the economy, then deficit, then Enron. I really do hope he latches on to this issue and develops it fully.
I am confidant the American people will truly treasure a politician that stays critical of each war time action and development that our president. We need the consistancy.
Again, why does he need all of the military information?
LBJ ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.