|
|
Personally, I'd like to see an "American History Month". |
Just imagine the socialists in the news media having a coronary over that one...
Posted on 02/26/2002 3:28:30 AM PST by Mean Daddy
What is called Black History Month might more accurately be called "the sins of white people" month. The sins of any branch of the human race are virtually inexhaustible, but the history of blacks in America includes a lot more than the sins of white people, which are put front and center each February.
Obviously, there is current political mileage to be gotten from historic grievances. At a minimum, politicians and activists get the media attention that is the lifeblood of their careers. Then there are racial quotas, money for special minority programs and hopes for reparations for slavery. If nothing else, some people get excuses for their own shortcomings -- and excuses are very important.
One of the many penetrating insights of the late Eric Hoffer was that, for many people, an excuse is better than an achievement. That is because an achievement, no matter how great, leaves you having to prove yourself again in the future. But an excuse can last for life.
Those black achievements which did not involve fighting the sins of white people get little attention during Black History Month. Indeed, many of those achievements undermine the blanket excuse that white sins are what prevent blacks from accomplishing more. How many people have heard of Paul Williams, who became a prominent black architect long before the civil rights revolution, or about successful black writers in the 19th century?
There was also an outstanding black high school in Washington, D.C., which had remarkable achievements from 1870 to 1955. For example, most of its graduates during that period went on to college, even though most white high school graduates did not make it to college during that era. As far back as 1899, this school's students scored higher on standardized tests than two of the three white academic high schools in the District of Columbia.
Given the terrible educational performances of so many ghetto schools, you might think that there would be great interest in how this particular school succeeded when so many others failed. But you would be wrong. Where there was any reaction at all from the black establishment to an article I wrote about the history of this school, that reaction was hostility.
Dunbar High School was an achievement, but it destroyed a thousand excuses. The prevailing dogma is that all the failures of black schools were due to the sins of white people, including inadequate funding and racial segregation. But Dunbar was inadequately funded -- its class sizes were 40 or more -- and it was racially segregated for more than 80 years. Its history of success was therefore not welcomed by black "leaders."
Another big problem with Black History Month is its narrowness. You cannot understand even your own history if that is the only history you know. Some explanations of what has happened in your history might sound plausible within the framework of just one people's history, but these explanations can collapse like a house of cards if you look at the same factors in the histories of other groups, other countries, and other eras.
Shelby Steele has pointed out that whites are desperate to escape guilt and blacks are desperate to escape implications of inferiority. But, viewed against the background of world history, neither group of Americans is unique. Nor are the differences between them. Both their anxieties are overblown.
Black-white differences in income, IQ, lifestyle or anything else you care to name are exceeded by differences between innumerable other groups around the world today and throughout history -- even when none of the factors that we blame for the differences in America was present.
For example, when the Romans invaded Britain, they came from an empire with magnificent art, architecture, literature, political organization and military might. But the Britons were an illiterate tribal people. There was not a building on the island, and no Briton's name had ever been recorded in the pages of history.
The Britons didn't build London. The Romans built London. And when the Romans left, four centuries later, the country fragmented into tribal domains again, the economy collapsed, and buildings and roads decayed. No one would have dreamed at that point that someday there would be a British Empire to exceed anything the Romans had ever achieved.
Maybe we need a British History Month.
|
|
Personally, I'd like to see an "American History Month". |
Just imagine the socialists in the news media having a coronary over that one...
Just imagine the socialists in the news media having a coronary over that one...
I share your sympathies on this. However, you and I both know what would happen. American History would totally ignore the founding of the nation, would not bring up the Constitution, BOR, DOI or the Articles of Confederation. Instead, American History as the inferiors...er...politicians would frame it would be drawn in terms of "the 60's" and some of the failed socialist/labor movements of the 19th and early 20th century. We'd get wars explained to us as the "results of unfettered capitalism" and not a single dead white male would make the list of great historical figures.
Cynical?....Nah, say it ain't so brother, say it ain't so.
That said, I also wanted to make sure you saw another example of Sowell's excellent reasoning.
Yes you did! This is a good explanation of the catch 22 situation that White America now finds itself in. There is no right answer here! Whatever Whites do somebody will find fault with it!
Personally, I don't think people should be called to account for the sins of their great grandfathers. If we are going to do that, hey, fine with me! I have some Native American blood in my family, and I'll be damned if I'm gonna pay the people that originated the "Buffalo Soldiers" that made war on my ancestors!
I don't know, but I always say...the only thing that beats a good freashing is a refreashing. =;^)
BZZZT! Sorry, incorrect. When slavery was instituted in the New World in the 17th Century, it was done by White colonial Britons. America had yet to exist. Also, slavery had a long and proud tradition in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia looooong before Europeans got into the business. Slavery was finally abolished by Americans, but we were about 10th to do so... but we had been struggling with the concept for several decades with the Compromises, etc. (Britain was one of the first, though. Maybe it should be Black British History month!)
Yes! YES! That is great! I cannot wait to use it as a point somewhere down the road.
What guilt and what inferiority? If everyone would stop looking for differences and look for similarities instead, the racial discord would end.
Yes. I can see where that could be most embarassing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.