Your #685 is a blatant lie, proving once again that you have absolutely no interest in truthfully understanding Calvinism.
God, who alone sovereignly decides whom He is going to regenerate, has Elected before the foundation of the World to irresistibly apply the Atonement to ALL infants whom He foreknew He would see fit to call from this life in infancy.
Ergo, in choosing the persons of the Elect, He chose to include all persons whom He foreknew He would call away from life in infancy. All of them.
Thi is not a "neo-calvinist" or "modified calvinist" view. You are just making these terms up to serve your lies. This has been the classic view of Calvinists for centuries. The mainstream of Calvinism so teaches, and has always so taught.
But do you care about that, when you could instead preach lies, and bear false witness, as you do in your #685?
No, you do not care. Your preference, and the desire of your heart, is instead to bear false witness, and preach lies.
And we Calvinists understand that!! It is, after all, just who you are, that's all.
I said that I believe he is not a classical calvinist, but is instead a neo-calvinist.
I really do believe that. How is it a lie?
You know, the way you phrase things makes you seem a melodramatic oddity? Are you a bit histrionic in your business life as well?