nice catch.
To global taxation and tryanny, having nothing to do with carbon dioxide or climate change. Pew is a creature of Sunoco, an oil company. So is the World Wildlife Fund, that's Shell. Then there's the big daddy of environmental funding, uh, that would be Rockefeller.
These creeps aren't happy making money on just oil, they want to make money on burning it by trading in the carbon credits. It'a a crooked scam.
projections of climate change based on models and assumptions which "are not only unknown, but unknowable within ranges relevant for policy-making"Guys, A lie by any other name is still a lie. In A commentary at News Max, Vox Day writes, "Science, for all of its tremendous accomplishments, is still merely the epitome of Man's knowledge......" in his "Satan, Science and the Supernatural". And, it would seem that science has become, not "the epitome of man's knowledge", but what man {scientists} can sell to the gullible. in the name of "science". Peace and love, George..
models which "do not adequately characterise clouds, water vapour, aerosols, ocean currents and solar effects"
a failure "to reproduce the difference in trends between the lower troposphere and surface temperatures over the past 20 years".
Ernest thanks for the ping!
Weakly-written article for the BBC, as you will note the above-listed defender of the media's 'consensus' is introduced without proper contextual explanation as to her role and attempted defense of the Global Warming Myth (GWM, for short). GWM, as used by me stands not for the simple proposition that the Earth is getting warmer, although the evidence is now clear from the poles that it isn't, but rather, that there is A) a Problem, and B) that its due to Man's emissions activities as advanced by the Kyoto treaty disciples) Both manifestly dubious propositions...
A critcal reader would note however, Claussen's bias-factors, e.g., entrenched self-interest in defending her previous work product, and her current career position. The Global Climate Change Foundation would go out of business, and her fat paycheck with it, if, in fact, there is no substantial global climate change .
That reminds me.........I need to get mine pumped.
The US group included a former CIA director and defence secretary, James Schlesinger
You know, if youre going to produce a report on the politicization of science, perhaps you could leave the non-scientific, politic appointees off your commission.
This herd of cats says what?
Nice to see that some have kept their objectivity. Now wish they'd explain how a CFC (which is heavier than the surrounding air..) can possibly reach the ozone layer.....