Sceptics denounce climate science 'lie'

BBC News ^ | 25 February, 2002 | Alex Kirby

[My Identity]

The authors challenge the key contradiction at the heart of the Kyoto Protocol, the global climate agreement - that climate is one of the most complex systems known, yet that we can manage it by trying to control a small set of factors, namely greenhouse gas emissions. Scientifically, this is not mere uncertainty: it is a lie."

In a nut shell...

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Nice catch!

Global Warming Hoax :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Global Warming Hoax , click below:
	click here >>>	Global Warming Hoax	<<< click here
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)

[Robert_Paulson2]

I always thought it strange that those who could NOT predict a rainy or sunny day with any degree of accuracy, could somehow project the future tendencies of our climate two weeks from now, let alone two hundred years hence.

nice catch.

[Carry_Okie]

"And Kyoto was only intended to be a first step in a long journey."

To global taxation and tryanny, having nothing to do with carbon dioxide or climate change. Pew is a creature of Sunoco, an oil company. So is the World Wildlife Fund, that's Shell. Then there's the big daddy of environmental funding, uh, that would be Rockefeller.

These creeps aren't happy making money on just oil, they want to make money on burning it by trading in the carbon credits. It'a a crooked scam.

[demkicker]

These global warming alarmist/crooks haven't had too much fun lately. First, Bush, then Nasa and now these prominent scientists are exposing their scam. Gotta love it.

[meenie]

And part of the drive to the New World Order. Socialize energy and food and you have the tools to control the world.

[George Frm Br00klyn Park]

• projections of climate change based on models and assumptions which "are not only unknown, but unknowable within ranges relevant for policy-making"
• models which "do not adequately characterise clouds, water vapour, aerosols, ocean currents and solar effects"
• a failure "to reproduce the difference in trends between the lower troposphere and surface temperatures over the past 20 years".

Guys, A lie by any other name is still a lie. In A commentary at News Max, Vox Day writes, "Science, for all of its tremendous accomplishments, is still merely the epitome of Man's knowledge......" in his "Satan, Science and the Supernatural". And, it would seem that science has become, not "the epitome of man's knowledge", but what man {scientists} can sell to the gullible. in the name of "science". Peace and love, George..

[George Frm Br00klyn Park]

"In A commentary at News Max, Vox Day writes,"

ALL, My BIG bad. Vox Day's article is at World Net Daily. SORRY 'bout that! Peace and love, George.

[Publius6961]

BUMP

[texson66]

To learn more about GoreBull Warming click the Taz!

[Phantom Lord]

A good source of information on the Global Warming Scam can be found here...

Science & Environmental Policy Project

[Grampa Dave]

MI, great find!

Ernest thanks for the ping!

[farmfriend]

Thanks for the flag.

[FreedomPoster]

Nice link, and cool picture for the link.

There's a link on that page to an article about "The Isle of the Dead" and the tide benchmark there. I had bookmarked that site long ago, under the general heading "wacko science as politics". It's good material for refuting the "oceans are rising quickly" nonsense.

[Paul Ross]

Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, used to work at the State Department and helped to shape US climate policy.

Weakly-written article for the BBC, as you will note the above-listed defender of the media's 'consensus' is introduced without proper contextual explanation as to her role and attempted defense of the Global Warming Myth (GWM, for short). GWM, as used by me stands not for the simple proposition that the Earth is getting warmer, although the evidence is now clear from the poles that it isn't, but rather, that there is A) a Problem, and B) that its due to Man's emissions activities as advanced by the Kyoto treaty disciples) Both manifestly dubious propositions...

A critcal reader would note however, Claussen's bias-factors, e.g., entrenched self-interest in defending her previous work product, and her current career position. The Global Climate Change Foundation would go out of business, and her fat paycheck with it, if, in fact, there is no substantial global climate change .

[Faraday]

Good post. The author is clearly biased, but the fact the BBC is recognizing the opposing argument shows they are beginning to "sweat" the details. The "global warming" science community and (hopefully) the socialist "third-way" political parties will pay a heavy price for their fear-mongering assault on free enterprise.

[madfly]

Thanks for the ping!

[johniegrad]

Sceptics denounce climate science 'lie'

That reminds me.........I need to get mine pumped.

[dead]

The US group included a former CIA director and defence secretary, James Schlesinger…

You know, if you’re going to produce a report on the politicization of science, perhaps you could leave the non-scientific, politic appointees off your commission.