[counterrevolutionary]

You seem to be rambling. Certainly neither a homosexual nor a heterosexual can be punished without due process. But that has literally nothing to do with the point at issue.

You have clearly fallen into the leftists' trap of believing that whatever you want to be the case must be in the Constitution, whether you can find the actual words in there or not, as if the Constitution was somehow meant to establish God's Justice (or at least your justice) on earth.

[tpaine]

You seem to be rambling.

Rambling? I have obeyed your commands, yet you have no snappy comeback? - Tough.

Certainly neither a homosexual nor a heterosexual can be punished without due process. But that has literally nothing to do with the point at issue.

-- - Yep, the point you have failed to rebut. - Tough on you again. - You have a problem? Take a position.

You have clearly fallen into the leftists' trap of believing that whatever you want to be the case must be in the Constitution, whether you can find the actual words in there or not, as if the Constitution was somehow meant to establish God's Justice (or at least your justice) on earth.

Your flawed opinions on mine are of little interest. -- And your opinions on God/constitution? -- Save them for your friends at church. - Make a rebuttal to my point, or quit whining.

[MissMillie]

I didn't realize that was a leftist way of looking at the Constitution., after all, it is usually the people on the right who say that the Constitution says nothing about "separation of church and state."