Rambling? I have obeyed your commands, yet you have no snappy comeback? - Tough.
Certainly neither a homosexual nor a heterosexual can be punished without due process. But that has literally nothing to do with the point at issue.
-- - Yep, the point you have failed to rebut. - Tough on you again. - You have a problem? Take a position.
You have clearly fallen into the leftists' trap of believing that whatever you want to be the case must be in the Constitution, whether you can find the actual words in there or not, as if the Constitution was somehow meant to establish God's Justice (or at least your justice) on earth.
Your flawed opinions on mine are of little interest. -- And your opinions on God/constitution? -- Save them for your friends at church. - Make a rebuttal to my point, or quit whining.
Number one, it doesn't actually answer the question.
Number two, even gramatically, it makes no sense as an answer to the question.
Number three, no one has suggested that people arrested under an anti-sodomy law are not entitled to due process. People arrested under anti-murder laws are also entitled to due process. Does that make anti-murder laws unconstitutional?
And now this discussion has gotten annoyingly silly, and so I will be saying goodbye, then, sir.
Goodbye, then, sir.