[plain talk]

If he signs this bill, I won't vote for him even if he's running against Hillary Clinton

Now THAT's a principled shoot-yourself-in-the-face-to-spite-your-ass conservative for you. pretty good.

[Lazamataz]

Now THAT's a principled shoot-yourself-in-the-face-to-spite-your-ass conservative for you. pretty good.

It's a statement of fact. It's not meant to be good, bad, or indifferent. Given the choice between two unprincipled Bill-of-Rights eviscerators, I choose neither.

To paraphrase Dubya: "Either you are for the Bill of Rights or you are against it."

[4CJ]

Nope. I agree with Laz, if W isn't man enough to veto this trash and uphold his oath to defend the Constitution I won't vote for W either.

[Protagoras]

Now THAT's a principled shoot-yourself-in-the-face-to-spite-your-ass conservative for you. pretty good.

So you will vote for someone who repeals the first amendment to avoid,,,,,what?

[ctdonath2]

You didn't read the rest of the sentence, did you? He justified it with:

because then I will have the choice between someone who will gut the bill of rights and someone who did gut the bill of rights.

Actions speak much louder than words.