Posted on 02/16/2002 8:28:04 AM PST by Sabertooth
Deport Themselves |
|||
Every time an illegal alien sets foot in America he or she is a knowing burglar, breaking and entering across our borders, violating our laws. They are also squatters, attempting to colonize our land and our nation. Every moment of their presence in our country is an ongoing criminal act. It is also illegal for a them to work here, so every cent these alien invaders take is done so illegally as is ever dollar of unearned subsides they're able to defraud from American taxpayers. Thus, all of the proceeds of the illegals' inhabitation of the United States are the ill-gotten gains of an ongoing criminal enterprise. As such, they ought to be treated like the proceeds of any other criminal enterprise, from fraud to theft to drug dealing to racketeering The assets of illegal aliens should be subject to total forfeiture. They are criminals, there is no moral reason why not. Therefore, a solution to much of our nation's problems with these international burglars resolves into focus |
|||
Amnesty for illegal aliens was tried in 1986, with a bipartisan bill that was signed into law by President Reagan. 2.7 million illegals were able to get green cards in a one-time only program. That amnesty would only happen once was an integral part of the bargain the federal government struck with the American people, who have always opposed illegal immigration by large margins. The other part of the bargain was a promise of effective law enforcement against future illegals. The craven betrayal of this promise to the American people is bipartisan. Presidents Reagan, Bush the Elder, and Clinton all ignored the problem of illegals, as did both parties in Congress with the lone exception of the Republicans in 1996. Key to this failure has been the unwillingness of the federal government to deport illegals, as the law provides, in large numbers from the interior of our country. Without deportation, there will be no solution to illegal immigration. Now that the cancer of illegals has metastasized to 12 million and growing, many of these same politicians suggest that the solution to their malfeasance of duty is some new form of amnesty "Nevermind the earlier deal with the American people, the problem is now too big for our laws to solve, we must Surrender." Their condescending gall is like that of death row lawyers who run out of appeals, and then suggest that execution after 15 years is cruel and unusual punishment. Any unpleasantness resulting from the delay is entirely the onus of our elected officials to bear. The American people never wanted their laws not to be enforced. Even the current White House of President George W. Bush is sending such signals with their periodic trial balloons about "normalizing undocumented workers" and "making their work legal." This is as much as saying "Because we broke our promise to enforce the law against illegal aliens, we have no choice to break our promise that amnesty would happen only once." Bunk.
We are told incessantly by these same spineless, duplicitous politicians from both parties how the problem of illegal immigration is intractable Much as many of those same cowards once described the problem of terrorism. Winning changes things, doesn't it? It's time to fight and win the battle against the illegal invaders, all 12 million-plus of them. We don't need to round them all up; we simply enact the appropriate and fully Constitutional legislation, and serve the aliens notice: "Be gone in 90 days. If you aren't, all of the proceeds of your criminal presence in the United States will be subject to total asset forfeiture." This will be the disincentive to their ongoing invasion. |
|||
|
|||
Some will leave, and some won't. After 90 days, we round up a few hundred thousand of them. That should be enough time to hire the manpower to process the invaders. Then we take all they own within our borders, recycle it into INS coffers, and send them swiftly back to their own countries, whether China, Mexico, Ireland, or wherever, with no profit for their illegal efforts. The other 12 million illegals will take heed. Step aside, and watch the stampede. It will only get easier
if only we start. |
I'm moderate on this issue though because with those few cases where the family is speaking English and has obeyed every other law including our laws on auto insurance, never used a social handout service, and the kids are comfortable in American society but would be aliens in Mexico, I'm for letting them stay.
View From Lodi, CA: How Miguel Got His Papers
|
Would they have to admit to their crime, and have it go on their record? What would be their restitution? If we had a program like this, how much should it cost them?
$25,000?
Should they be permanently disqualified from citizenship, voting, and unearned subsidies out of taxpayer pockets?
And not with my vote.
You're welcome. It's an interesting idea. Why don't you send it to the editorial sections of WorldNetDaily and others? Heck, I'd even try sending it to your Congressman and Senator.
A little messy... though the illegals who break into private property and ranches as they cross the border are far too coddled.
Really, I just want the illegals out of America with the most cost-effective means possible. Asset forfeiture would be pretty much self-funding.
My Senators are Feinstein and Boxer, and my Congressman is Clinton shill and former professional tax collector, Brad Sherman.
They've already crawled under the fence.
To some extent this is true... not all 12 million would deport themselves.
But asset forfeiture would definitely make a smaller haystack, and provide less incentive for newcomers. Also, guest worker programs would become far more attractive.
And the INS would have a profit motive to enforce the law, though it's sad that's necessary.
How did these industries ever survive before the invasion of illegal immigrants from Mexico? Boo Hoo. How terrible that they will have to employ American citizens and legal residents at substantially higher wages. Will there be temporary shortages of labor? You bet there will be but that is the road that these enterprises went down when they chose, against the laws of this country, it hire illegal aliens. I have NO sympathy for them at all.
And perhaps you should be thinking a few steps ahead on the Trojan Horse of illegal immigration. At some point these illegals will become quasi-citizens (many already are) and their children will be citizens. What sort of wages do you think this illegal bunch from Mexico will be demanding for their labor then? Is your solution then to keep importing tens of millions of Mexicans to keep the train of illegal labor going? Or do we start importing illegal labor from China? Where does our immigration free for all end?
That's far preferable than causing an immediate economic depression which is what is being advocated on this thread.
We have one now. It needs to be better utilized and and enforced, and perhaps expanded.
But as long as incentives for illegal immigration persist, the guest worker program is a joke.
That's far preferable than causing an immediate economic depression which is what is being advocated on this thread.
Hardly. The 90 day figure was arbitrary. We can make it 6 months, if we have reason to believe that's necessary. Our economy won't dry up without illegals.
You're also ignoring the benefits of eliminating the cost of the colonistas... many government budgets could be balanced if we remove the illegals or they remove themselves. Schools and prison overcrowding would be substantially mitigated.
Don't be so alarmist and inclined to Surrender.
Actually, the way you want to use this appeals to me. As your statement is accurate, paying assets siezed as commissions to the INS and Border Patrol agents directly would motivate them to enforce the law regardless of the recalcitrance of their superiors. You've got something here.
ijcr and others suggestions about employers have merit also, but your point about existing law is the place to start to sort out who is a "knowing" illegal employer.
I enjoy reading your opinions, go ahead and submit some to likely venues, I think you will be pleasntly surprised.
Bingo... Look at Lebanon and Kosovo and Palestine...
Illegal immigrants and/or their descendents are primary causes of those bloodbaths.
A Guest Worker program is just another name for Amnesty. The illegals know how to game our system very well with phony documents, payoffs and anchor babies. Bush knows the game too, which is why Amnesty will be called Guest Worker to make it sound less of an affront to Americans than it is. Also, why would you think for one second that our government would suddenly get discipline in the system when it has not evidenced a shred of discipline on immigration? EVER! You don't think the media would be running countless sob stories of guest workers forced to go home after their time is up?
That's far preferable than causing an immediate economic depression which is what is being advocated on this thread.
In recessions the hallmark of insanity is to import more illegal labor into the system. Many Americans are already experiencing a depression because of illegal immigration and there are quite a few white-collar people in the same situation with the gross excesses of H1-B visas. It is time for the business sector to get a dose of their own medicine. Again, I have no sympathy for those that chose to break our laws and hire illegal labor.
Actually, my proposal was more institutional... But your idea of some sort of bounty on illegals is worth further consideration. Especially since the illegals would be paying it themselves.
One problem would be to build in safeguards against overzealous agents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.