Skip to comments.
UK Queen Mother Too Ill to Consume Food
Ananova News Wire and the London Daily Sun Newspaper ^
| February 14, 2002 GMT
| What the Papers Say Column
Posted on 02/13/2002 7:27:57 PM PST by codebreaker
Ananova:
What Tomorrow's Papers Say
The London Daily Sun
QUEEN MUM TO ILL TO EAT
The Queen Mother is now so ill she is unable to eat.
Story filed 1:18 Thursday, February 14, 2002 Greenwich Mean Time
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-166 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator
To: MadIvan;all
From Ananova:
A helicopter has landed at Sandringham as the Queen Mother prepares to travel to Windsor ready for the funeral of Princess Margaret.
As the helicopter landed the Duke of Edinburgh drove into Sandringham in a dark green Range Rover.
The 101-year-old royal was planning to travel to the Royal Lodge at Windsor despite cutting her arm in a fall yesterday.
The Queen Mother was said to be "very hopeful" of making it to Windsor for the funeral, despite cutting her arm yesterday when she slipped getting up from a chair in her sitting room.
Senior members of the Royal Family, including the Prince of Wales, Prince William and Prince Harry, are expected to gather at Windsor for the funeral service, which starts at 3pm tomorrow.
The Princess Royal is expected to return from America, where she is at the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics, in time for the funeral.
Princess Margaret's coffin will be taken to Windsor later today.
Dean of the Chapels Royal Richard Chartres, who is the Bishop of London, and Sub-Dean William Booth, the Queen's domestic chaplain, will say prayers over the coffin as it is lifted by pallbearers into a hearse for the journey to Windsor.
Once at Windsor, the Princess's body will rest overnight in the nave at St George's Chapel.
Story filed: 14:50 Thursday 14th February 2002
102
posted on
02/14/2002 6:20:54 AM PST
by
Arkle
To: DoughtyOne
Re: #59 Great post as usual, DO.
The Queen is the last of the wartime leaders, a great example of class & dignity for three quarters of a century. Such living history should be treasured.
103
posted on
02/14/2002 6:22:12 AM PST
by
skeeter
To: Friend_Or_Foe
Oh cut it out. "breeding" and "class" my foot!! The royal worship around here is getting sickening. These royal people are arrogant, inbred, bloodsuckers. Which one of them has ever worked a day in their life?
Thank God I am a citizen, not a subject. I don't bow to anyone.
To: spectre
Bet the ranch, she will be there tomorrow...
To: southern rock
It is not 'royal worship' to point out how the Queen Mum courageously stood up against the Nazis.
To: codebreaker
It is not 'royal worship' to point out how the Queen Mum courageously stood up against the Nazis. Yeah, well so did we Americans, and we didn't need a monarchy to do it.
Comment #108 Removed by Moderator
To: southern rock
That's right, you are not a British citizen, but can't you have the decency to show sympathy to people who are? And if you bow to no one I assume you are an atheist.
109
posted on
02/14/2002 6:35:21 AM PST
by
TracyPA
To: southern rock
Oh cut it out. "breeding" and "class" my foot!! The royal worship around here is getting sickening. These royal people are arrogant, inbred, bloodsuckers. Which one of them has ever worked a day in their life?
Our present Queen worked as an ambulance mechanic in World War II. Prince Andrew and Prince Charles were both in the Royal Navy. Andrew served in the Falklands War on a ship that got blown up no less. The Queen Mum was part of the relief efforts during the Second World War. There is also the factor of leadership. Having a good King and Queen can do wonders for your morale in desperate times.
But go on then, it's easier for you to spout off in ignorance and bile than to reflect carefully, obviously. Read, learn, then come back and apologise.
PS - we have been British "citizens" for quite some time now - it says "British citizen" in my passport.
Ivan
110
posted on
02/14/2002 6:38:00 AM PST
by
MadIvan
To: Friend_Or_Foe
I have read that graffiti is a means of releasing pent-up, and sometimes dangerous, emotions. I sometimes wonder if that doesn't apply to several people who post on this forum.
To: southern rock
Yeah, well so did we Americans, and we didn't need a monarchy to do it.
Americans don't have separate offices for Head of State and the actual political leader of the country. This can actually get you into trouble, considering how some people were reluctant to dump Clinton on his sorry arse because of merely respecting the office he held.
Ivan
112
posted on
02/14/2002 6:39:25 AM PST
by
MadIvan
To: TracyPA
That's right, you are not a British citizen, but can't you have the decency to show sympathy to people who are? The British are subjects, not citizens, and I cannot respect that. And I do not respect multi-generational welfare families. I don't know why the British people allow the monarchy to continue. I can't even fathom it.
And if you bow to no one I assume you are an atheist.
Well, no mortal human, at least.
To: southern rock
By the way, lad, you're bringing a spoon to a gun fight. You'd better find something better than your inherent distaste for royals to disparage the Queen Mum. That may fly after a few beers down at the pub, but not on this level.
Ivan
114
posted on
02/14/2002 6:40:50 AM PST
by
MadIvan
Comment #115 Removed by Moderator
To: southern rock
The British are subjects, not citizens, and I cannot respect that
We are citizens, and have been designated as such for quite some time. Besides, you're distaste is based on nomenclature. People may be called "subjects" but does that mean Charles was using ius primus nocte on his typing pool? Of course not. Being a royal in Britain is to be in the most scrutinised position in your life. You can't even go down to the pub and have a quiet drink and not have it reported in the papers. Ask Prince Harry.
Ivan
116
posted on
02/14/2002 6:43:18 AM PST
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
One question. Do you enjoy supporting them and their lifestyle with you tax dollars?
To: southern rock
I'd turn around and ask you how much you enjoy paying for the lifestyle that your Senators, Representatives and President and their attendant bureaucrats get. At least the Queen now pays tax and not just on what she gets for the Civil List - she gets taxed on her outside earnings. How much of the perks that your representatives get are tax free?
Ivan
118
posted on
02/14/2002 6:46:02 AM PST
by
MadIvan
To: southern rock
If you don't respect multi-generational welfare families, how the heck can you be proud of Texas?
You've been supporting generations of Bush folks, not too mention many others.
P.S. To many Brits, "subject" means close to "part owner".
P.S. I'd much rather have a beer with Ivan than be in the same gene pool as the crass whiner you are.
To: MadIvan
Of course not. Being a royal in Britain is to be in the most scrutinised position in your life. You can't even go down to the pub and have a quiet drink and not have it reported in the papers. Ask Prince Harry. Then why do they do it? Why don't they just quit? put an end to it all? Why doesn't Harry just say "screw this", and get a factory job?
Living well at taxpayer expense can be addictive.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-166 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson