Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sender
Atheists like this Kahle fellow run around, allegedly full of principles, but with no ultimate source for them. I mean rally, what grounds does this guy have that there should be no crosses on public land? His own opinion? That is all atheists have in the end, and therefore they are never consistent.
9 posted on 02/12/2002 9:41:44 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Zack Nguyen
Just because one is an atheist, it does not mean that one does not have a source for one's principles. One's principles can be drawn from science and the physical universe; they do not need to be drawn from supranatural sources.

However, as you say, there is no legitimate reason for taking crosses, which do no harm to anyone.

25 posted on 02/12/2002 11:33:38 AM PST by Jeremy_Bentham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson