Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hank Kerchief
I was aiming for a light-hearted suggestion that they were digging themselves a deeper hole by using a term, "verbiage", that could be construed as describing the Pledge as wordy.

Other than that, I wouldn't blow the whole matter out of proportion, but agree with those who suggest that they would have been better off handling the presentation differently. "One Nation Indivisible" might have been better than the use of the ellipsis.

116 posted on 02/09/2002 6:21:40 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: governsleastgovernsbest
Other than that, I wouldn't blow the whole matter out of proportion, but agree with those who suggest that they would have been better off handling the presentation differently. "One Nation Indivisible" might have been better than the use of the ellipsis.
I see. Good analysis.

When they truncate it from:

"One Nation, Under God, Indivisible"
to
"One Nation...Indivisible"
using an ellipsis, it implies that God is "unnecessary," (sort of lost "in the dots") since the PRIMARY definition for "ellipsis" is "omission of a word or phrase necessary for a complete syntactical construction but not necessary for understanding."

OTOH, I think that we may be reading TOO MUCH into this. Still, it reminds me of the old story about living your life in "The Dash," from

http://www.lindaslyrics.com/The%20Dash%20Poem.html

120 posted on 02/09/2002 6:49:39 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson