Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Princess Margaret Dies
BBC.com ^ | Saturday, 9 February, 2002, 08:56 GMT | staff

Posted on 02/09/2002 12:14:34 AM PST by badfreeper

Princess Margaret, the younger sister of Queen Elizabeth II, has died "peacefully in her sleep" at the age of 71. In a statement Buckingham Palace said: "The Queen, with great sadness, has asked for the following announcement to be made immediately.

"Her beloved sister, Princess Margaret, died peacefully in her sleep this morning at 6.30am in the King Edward VII Hospital."

Her children Lord Linley and Lady Sarah Chatto were at her side at the London hospital.

Princess Margaret, who has suffered several strokes in recent years, suffered a further stroke on Friday afternoon.

She developed cardiac problems during the night and was taken from Kensington Palace to the hospital at 0230GMT.

She was born Margaret Rose on 21 August, 1930, at Glamis Castle in Scotland, the ancestral home of her mother's family.

Margaret was last seen in public before Christmas at Princess Alice, the Dowager Duchess of Gloucester's 100th birthday party.

She was confined to a wheelchair and wore heavy dark glasses, her sight having been affected by a stroke. Margaret's face also appeared puffy, understood to be the effects of medication.

© MMII


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-236 next last
To: TrueBrit
I'm not a monarchist, so to me Margaret was somone's daughter, sister, aunt, mom, friend. My condolences to those who will miss her.
81 posted on 02/09/2002 9:02:40 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: TrueBrit
I would ask one simple question: you recall that Margaret scalded her feet in an 'accident' around two years ago? Ask yourself, why was nobody ever implicated or brought to book for such an act? It's easy to say it was a poor confused old lady having an accident, but I assure you, these things don't just happen.

I wondered about this earlier today. I mean, wondered HOW this happened.

Condolences to her family and friends. I don't understand why so many are dumping on her.

82 posted on 02/09/2002 9:06:08 AM PST by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Arkle
No, you are wrong, there shall be no rejoicing at the passing of Queen Mum, God bless her.

I do not know where you get your sick thoughts from. I trust that America is not like yourself, for it's own sake.

83 posted on 02/09/2002 9:06:49 AM PST by TrueBrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Apparently the Queen takes after the Queen Mother
whose family are long lived. Princess Margaret takes
after her father who was somewhat sickly and died
relatively young. I don't know how true it is and I
suppose the 50 years of heavy drinking, chain smoking
and not much exercise didn't help. I just hope she
enjoyed life. Despite her much advertised failings
it is fair to say she had the most well balanced royal
children of them all.
84 posted on 02/09/2002 9:08:28 AM PST by flitton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar
You really are a pathetic jerk. Usually I ignore your posts, hoping you'll go away, but your snickering and carrying on like some drunken intruder at a wake is completely beyond the bounds of polite behavior.

As you sow, may you also reap. Jerk.

85 posted on 02/09/2002 9:14:34 AM PST by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
>...completely beyond the bounds of polite behavior.

[laughs] Wow. And this coming from a libertarian!

Mark W.

86 posted on 02/09/2002 9:18:41 AM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Oh I certainly agree. There have been no shortages of useful idiots in this country. That's the problem, we have a surplus, and they get their marching orders from the mighty Television. If you ever watch the movie Metropolis by Fritz Lang, you can substitute the great clock, for a tv and you have exactly what is going on in America today.

Fritz Lang was a prophetic film maker.

87 posted on 02/09/2002 9:22:48 AM PST by MadRobotArtist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #88 Removed by Moderator

To: MarkWar
Keep proving my point, jerk.
89 posted on 02/09/2002 9:24:34 AM PST by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Britain is not and was not a dictatorship. Margaret was a big girl. She could have married him if she had wanted to, but it would have meant giving up her royal title and perks probably. I guess she loved that life more than she did Townsend. She made her choice, and I think that choice made her miserable for every day of the rest of her life.

True, but she also would have lost her family by marrying Townsend, as they undoubtedly would have disowned her.

90 posted on 02/09/2002 9:29:00 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago;mewzilla
Margaret was faced with a choice between marrying a divorced man and doing her Royal duty as an upholder of traditional morality. She bravely chose duty. It seems almost incomprehensible to us today, but there it is.
91 posted on 02/09/2002 9:34:59 AM PST by Arkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Tofa Swiftgoat
That same assurance certainly applies to those who call themselves senator in the US. My point was, it matters not whether you were born to a royal family, it matters how you live your life. There are good royals and bad royals just as there are good and bad in all walks of life.
92 posted on 02/09/2002 9:35:21 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
What did Bill Clinton or Abraham Lincoln ever produce but misery for all concerned?
93 posted on 02/09/2002 9:36:26 AM PST by Edmund Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
If they disowned her for marrying the man she loved, then her family deserved to be the ones disowned, and the loss would have theirs, not Margaret's. That's one of the things about the British royals that drives me nuts, the amount of emotional roadkill they've left in the wake of doing what's right for the monarchy. Their sad interpretation of it, anyway.

But I am so sorry for their loss, especially since they've got to do their mourning under a microscope.

94 posted on 02/09/2002 9:38:19 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: TrueBrit
TrueBrit,

My condolences to you and all the people of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, The Bahamas, Barbados, Grenada, and all of the other Queen's Realms in the Commonwealth.

I can't help thinking of the sad thought that the late King (George VI) has been waiting for his wife to join him in eternity, but instead is welcoming his youngest daughter...

95 posted on 02/09/2002 9:40:42 AM PST by GreenLanternCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Arkle
Going to war is doing your duty. Not cheating on your spouse is doing your duty. Not breaking the laws of your country is doing your duty.

Not embarrassing your Royal relatives comes so far down the list that you need a scanning electron microscope to see it, unless it involves something like what's listed above.

Margaret should've walked away. Sometimes, we have a duty to ourselves, and this was one of those times.

96 posted on 02/09/2002 9:42:21 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
During WWII didn't both of the sisters volunteer in the hospital corps?
97 posted on 02/09/2002 9:45:05 AM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TEXICAN II
First let me state that I am quite familiar with the hubris that political science has become, being an ABD with a major in comparative politics.

I am crude & many think very rude-but I understand that some other nations have valid, positive political systems for the articulation, assimilation & adjudication of the many competing political wants & needs of their people ( took an entire two semester course based on those three words & found it instructive ).

I do not prescribe to the "cultural" and "moral" equivalence school of thought. Some cultures are clearly superior as are some political systems. That after all is the stuff that politics is made of. The European "democracies" with their majoritarian parliamentary systems succumb to tyrannical majorities since the same parties control both the legislative and executive branches and there are no checks and balances.

I do not view the culture of a headhunter society to be valid in modern times any more than I view the European political systems with their entrenched class divisions and class interests to be in any way equivalent to the superiority of the American system engineered by those luminaries we refer to as our "founding fathers". The American revolution was after all an effort to divorce ourselves from that ossified European system.

In my view some systems are more valid than others and some cultures are more superior than others. On both counts the American "republican" system wins hands down.

The fact that the rest of the planet lives in the squalor of their inferiority (including the Europeans) should not mean that we should not point out their inadequacies even if some Europeans or any one else may feel offended.

I will grant that Europeans are a notch above other primitve backward societies such as Muslim ones, but not by much. I will neither retract nor will I apologize for being forward thinking in these matters. I realize that may sound chauvinistic in some quarters, but that's simply too bad.

I do not believe as many in the left do that we should keep these backward societies pristine and on their own. Civilizations and democracy expands by imposing itself outward. All of these cultures need to be swept aside and modernized if they are to survive in the modern world. While we may have inherited a cultural heritage from the Europeans we have moved ahead since 1776 while they have obstinately remained mired in the nostalgic past of their past accomplishments. Throughout most of the 20th century the European contribution to technology, music, art etc. has been marginal at best, though still far ahead of backwaters such as Saudi Arabia.

In politics their major contribution was all of the "isms" such as, nazism, fascism, communism, socialism etc. They gave us two world wars and millions of dead through despotic totalitarian regimes.

I mourn the death of the princess, it is unfortunate that she dropped dead. Hey, we all have to go sometime. But don't expect me to give these parasites any sympathy whatsoever.

I only hope that Europeans will at some point see the light and move forward by ridding themselves of the anachronisms of their societies that no longer have relevance to a modern world.

98 posted on 02/09/2002 9:46:24 AM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
I don't see where "other" people afforded these parasites anything. Thery took it upon themselves and imposed it on others by force of arms. The people being the sheep that they are adopted the system in the name of "tradition".

As for an American nobility, I simply don't see it. I currently see no descendants of the founders of this country having a monopoly on power or living a parasitic welfare like life. Even that wealthy families of this country may have influence as a consequence of our free market system but we have nothing equivalent to the anachronism of European royalty and nobility.

99 posted on 02/09/2002 9:46:41 AM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
As I say, it seems incomprehensible to us nowadays. We live in more selfish times, and the British attitude to divorce has changed out of all recognition.

It's helpful to put the events into their historical context. Margaret's uncle, Edward VIII, had done great damage to the monarchy when walking away from his duty. Her mother, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, blames Wallis Simpson for the early death of her husband George to this day.

Another point is that Margaret was of the old school. She was taught that with the extraordinary privileges of being royalty come extraordinary responsibilities, much greater than those of other people. It's an idea which the younger members of the family seem to have largely abandoned.

I suppose it's like they say. The past is a foreign country. They do things differently there.

100 posted on 02/09/2002 9:54:53 AM PST by Arkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson