[TightSqueeze]

Will no one will shed a tear for the misunderstood tobacco junkie.
Now all you holier-than-thou–law-abiding tobacco fiends will understand what the typical pot smoker endures, at the least, you will be able to discuss it at long length though jail cell bars!

[Madame Dufarge]

What is your problem?

You're making a HUGE assumption.

[Great Dane]

#12...... There you go again, you don't sound like you just have good memories of pot, more like you are still making good memories. :-}

[Gabz]

Will no one will shed a tear for the misunderstood tobacco junkie. Now all you holier-than-thou–law-abiding tobacco fiends will understand ........

Why do you insist on being so antagonistic? I'm sure you wouldn't appreciate being labeled "pot-head" because of your position on the marijuana laws. You seem to be unaware that there are many non-users of tobacco that have the same problems with these regulations that the smokers have.

If all you wish to do is find fault with people discussing an issue different than yours, why don't you just leave us alone.

[Just another Joe]

In the first place, to call us "misunderstood tobacco junkies" is completely wrong.
We, on this forum, are neither misunderstood nor junkies. We have made our understanding of this issue crystal clear many times.
As for understanding how the pot smokers feel, I personally knew that a LOOONG time ago. I no longer partake, through personal choice not through governmental interference, but I begrudge no one that choice.
Most of the "tobacco junkies" on this forum like to smoke, but the real issue is property rights. Until they DO outlaw tobacco, which I'm not so sure will happen, the property owner SHOULD be able to make the choice of whether or not to allow smoking of tobacco on their property, NOT the government. Federal, state, county, or city.