Your three points were all that you derived from my comments?
Go back and read it again.
I used "European" to describe what you had failed with "Cacausian". Anthropology 101.
Your three points were all that you derived from my comments?
A better question would be: did you actually write what you wrote? As long as you don't deny having written the following, my rebuttal to your "extinction" theory stands, every bit of it.
Hey New York times, how about a "save the Race" run or a telethon or a concert to save the endangered Caucasian? What? No concern over this topic? Garsh, what a surprise.
And therefore I submit that a major truism of the left is breached by the Times'. Extinction is okay if it's the proper entity that is headed in that direction.
It is only the Times that seems to be "just fine" with the prospects of a race in decline.
A careful study of the policies of the United Nations in conjunction with leading western powers would likely show the reason why the white populace is in rapid decline. But that study might open a few eyes. Evidently the New York Times agrees. For if eyes were opened, it would become appearent that the policies we have adopted are having a devistating effect on our very existance as a race.