Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POLL: Pro-Life OR Pro-Abortion
FreedomFriend | 02/02/02 | FreedomFriend

Posted on 02/02/2002 10:51:56 AM PST by FreedomFriend

This is a simple question in which I want to gain insight. At least in terms of the opinions of the FreeRepublic population.

I'll tabulate the responses.

So what are you? Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-305 next last
To: FreedomFriend
Pro-life.
101 posted on 02/02/2002 12:47:04 PM PST by markn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
I'm anti-choice, according to folks here in Columbia, MO. But you can call me pro-life.
102 posted on 02/02/2002 12:48:41 PM PST by TheRightWingConspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Pro-life and pro-death penalty to uphold life all the way from the womb (conception) to the tomb, as a god-given right.
103 posted on 02/02/2002 12:49:48 PM PST by boltfromblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Hack
Under oath in July 1997, abortionist Carhart comments on how he commits abortions. Here he is questioned by his attorney:

Question: Are there times when you don’t remove the fetus intact?

Carhart: Yes, sir.

Question: Can you tell me about that, when that occurs?

Carhart: That occurs when the tissue fragments, or frequently when you rupture the membranes, an arm will spontaneously prolapse through the oz. I think most...statistically the most common presentation, we talk about the forehead or the skull being first. We talked about the feet being first, but I think in probably the great majority of terminations, it’s what they world call a transverse lie, so really you’re looking at a side profile of a curved fetus. When the patient...the uterus is already starting to contract and they are starting to miscarry, when you rupture the waters, usually something prolapses through the uterine, through the cervical os, not always, but very often an extremity will.

Question: What do you do then?

Carhart: My normal course would be to dismember that extremity and then go back and try to take the fetus out either foot or skull first, whatever end I can get to first.

Question: How do you go about dismembering that extremity?

Carhart: Just traction and rotation, grasping the portion that you can get a hold of which would be usually somewhere up the shaft of the exposed portion of the fetus, pulling down on it through the os, using the internal os as your counter-traction and rotating to dismember the shoulder or the hip or whatever it would be. Sometimes you will get one leg and you can’t get the other leg out.

Question: In that situation, are you, when you pull on the arm and remove it, is the fetus still alive?

Carhart: Yes.

Question: In that situation, are you, when you pull on the arm and remove it, is the fetus still alive?

Carhart: Yes

Question: Do you consider an arm, for example, to be a substantial portion of the fetus?

Carhart: In the way I read it, I think if I lost my arm, that would be a substantial loss to me. I think I would have to interpret it that way.

Question: And then what happens next after you remove the arm? You then try to remove the rest of the fetus?

Carhart: Then I would go back and attempt to either bring the feet down or bring the skull down, or even sometimes you bring the other arm down and remove that also and then get the feet down.

Question: At what point is the fetus...does the fetus die during that process?

Carhart: I don’t really know. I know that the fetus is alive during the process most of the time because I can see fetal heartbeat on the ultrasound.

The Court: Counsel, for what it’s worth, it still is unclear to me with regard to the intact D&E when fetal demise occurs.

Question: Okay, I will try to clarify that. In the procedure of an intact D&E where you would start foot first, with the situation where the fetus is presented feet first, tell me how you are able to get the feet out first.

Carhart: Under ultrasound, you can see the extremities. You know what is what. You know what the foot is, you know, what the arm is, you know, what the skull is. By grabbing the feet and pulling down on it or by grabbing a knee and pulling down on it, usually you can get one leg out, get the other leg out and bring the fetus out. I don’t know where this...all the controversy about rotating the fetus comes from. I don’t attempt to do that. I just attempt to bring out whatever is the proximal portion of the fetus.

Question: At the time that you bring out the feet in this example, is the fetus still alive?

Carhart: Yes.

Question: Then what’s the next step you do?

Carhart: I didn’t mention it. I should. I usually attempt to grasp the cord first and divide the cord, if I can do that.

Question: What is the cord?

Carhart: The cord is the structure that transports the blood, both arterial and venous, from the fetus to the back to the fetus, and it gives the fetus its only source of oxygen, so that if you can divide the cord, the fetus will eventually die, but whether this takes five minutes or fifteen minutes and when that occurs, I don’t think anyone really knows.

Question: Are there situations where you don’t divide the cord?

Carhart: There are situations when I can’t.

Question: What are those?

Carhart: I just can’t get to the cord. It’s either high above the fetus and structures where you can’t reach up that far. The instruments are only 11 inches long.

Question: Let’s take the situation where you haven’t divided the cord because you couldn’t, and you have begun to remove a living fetus feet first. What happens next after you have gotten the feet removed?

Carhart: We remove the feet and continue with traction on the feet until the abdomen and the thorax came through the cavity. At that point, I would try ... you have to bring the shoulders down, but you can get enough of them outside, you can do this with your finger outside of the uterus, and then at that point the fetal ... the base of the fetal skull is usually in the cervical canal.

Question: What do you do next?

Carhart: And you can reach that, and that’s where you would rupture the fetal skull to some extent and aspirate the contents out.

Question: At what point in that process does fetal demise occur between initial remove...removal of the feet or legs and the crushing of the skull, or I’m sorry, the decompressing of the skull?

Carhart: Well, you know, again, this is where I’m not sure what fetal demise is. I mean, I honestly have to share your concern, your Honor. You can remove the cranial contents and the fetus will still have a heartbeat for several seconds or several minutes, so is the fetus alive? I would have to say probably, although I don’t think it has any brain function, so it’s brain dead at that point.

Question: So the brain death might occur when you begin suctioning out of the cranium?

Carhart: I think brain death would occur because the suctioning to remove contents is only two or three seconds, so somewhere in that period of time, obviously not when you penetrate the skull, because people get shot in the head and the don’t die immediately from that, if they are going to die at all, so that probably is not sufficient to kill the fetus, but I think removing the brain contents eventually will.

Later under cross examination from the AG’S counsel, Carhart stated:

"My intent in every abortion I have ever done is to kill the fetus and terminate the pregnancy."



104 posted on 02/02/2002 12:49:53 PM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Hack
Your sentiments reflect an oxymoron...or maybe just simple moron....just kidding...you said you could take it. I do however vehemently disagree with you.
105 posted on 02/02/2002 12:51:02 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Hack
Then the democrats would have no one to raise and get taxes from :)
106 posted on 02/02/2002 12:51:21 PM PST by Mfkmmof4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Hack
Is that not like the military families who encourage the kids to go in harm's way for a noble cause, freedom , not genocide for their people?
107 posted on 02/02/2002 12:52:16 PM PST by boltfromblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Hack
Has anyone noticed that every baby/child photo posted on this thread is caucasian? Why is that?

Wrong

108 posted on 02/02/2002 12:52:18 PM PST by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
You have not seen poverty my friend. I may be a moron but I've been to India, Africa, and Mexico. The squallor is horrible. What do you have to offer but more of the same?

You sir, are a fool.

109 posted on 02/02/2002 12:53:40 PM PST by Partisan Hack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
I was once pro-choice many years ago. Then I was involved in something that changed my life forever. I am now a 100% Pro-Life conservative.
110 posted on 02/02/2002 12:55:13 PM PST by freeranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
No abortion
No contraception
No euthanasia
No experimentation on human embryos
No screwing around with embryonic stem cells
Yes death penalty. (The first guy on the list killed my cousin)
111 posted on 02/02/2002 12:56:23 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Ptaz
Hardly......abortion in this country has mushroomed exponentially to the nth power since Roe V Wade....there are 2-4 million legal abortions per year now. Before Roe there were at most maybe 1-5% of that figure and no....illegal abortions were not killing 15-20,000 women a year like the femi-nazis claim.
112 posted on 02/02/2002 12:56:35 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Hack
dunno....what's yer point Hack?....too many white babies LOL.
113 posted on 02/02/2002 12:58:16 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
In fact, the last 2 were born while in my 40's and are perfect!! Go figure!! Yes, God is good!!
114 posted on 02/02/2002 12:59:25 PM PST by Mfkmmof4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Hack
I thought you could Take It.....oh yes dear friend I've lived all over the world....including West Africa and a stint in Haiti....it's not up to us who is born...it's up to God....likewise for who survives after being born.

You're bolstering your pro-abortion argument with Mengele-ish Darwinistic culling.

How noble of you.

115 posted on 02/02/2002 1:02:05 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
Need I say....

ANTI-ABORTION with a vengence

It's the worst holocaust the world has ever known till now.

116 posted on 02/02/2002 1:03:42 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
typo=vengeance....
117 posted on 02/02/2002 1:09:24 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
How heartbreaking--what is the context of this photo?
An abortion picture site can be accessed here: Click here
118 posted on 02/02/2002 1:11:28 PM PST by zbogwan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: supercat
First of all, that is exactly what partial-birth abortion, Roe v. Wade, and Doe v. Bolton permit: abortion at any time up to, and including, 60 seconds before live birth.

At the other end, "pro-life" does begin prior to conception. That includes disallowing a morning-after pill, which is nothing more than a chemical abortifacent. Many studies, reports, and personal testimonies by women who have become pregnant following rape have demonstrated a clear and close relationship between carrying the child to term and healing from the rape experience. In other words, the woman who aborts a child conceived in rape has a much more difficult time "getting over" or healing from the rape than a woman who carries the child to term and delivers it.

119 posted on 02/02/2002 1:15:29 PM PST by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Prov3456
PRO-LIFE!
120 posted on 02/02/2002 1:17:33 PM PST by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-305 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson