Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: asneditor
"Why is it just now that they decided to cover the statues? Doesn't it seem kind of silly when you think about?"

I can answer those questions! The reason is this: the liberal media would like nothing more than to find a way to continually embarass Ashcroft - why? because he's been open about his commitment to Christ. Sooooo, being the arrogant, rude and a few other things that the liberal media are - they seem to take great joy in getting pictures of Ashcroft with the nude statue. There's nothing against the statue - it's how the media is using it to embarass Ashcroft EVERY TIME HE COMES TO THAT AREA TO MAKE SOME KIND OF ANNOUNCEMENT - this is ridiculous! The easy way to solve the problem is just to cover the statue up and therefore deny the media it's joy at embarassing Ashcroft.

And ... I might add - no self-respecting photographer would have allowed such a rude picture to have made it to the newspapers or magazines.

447 posted on 01/28/2002 1:47:01 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]


To: CyberAnt
I think you and I will have to agree to disagree too. :-) I don't see anything offensive by the statues. I'm really not sure why our AG would worry about it. The statues have been there for over 60 years and not any other politician of any sort has given it a second thought. Just seems to me there is far more urgent bidness to take care of than to worry about some old naked statue that nobody pays any attention to anyway.
452 posted on 01/28/2002 1:52:09 PM PST by asneditor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson