Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SECRET PAKISTANI AIRLIFT AIDED TALIBAN, AL QAEDA FIGHTERS
The DrudgeReport ^ | January 20, 2002

Posted on 01/20/2002 9:25:53 AM PST by CreekerFreeper

MAG: SECRET PAKISTANI AIRLIFT AIDED TALIBAN, AL QAEDA FIGHTERS

Sun Jan 20 2002 12:15:41 ET

American intelligence officials and high-ranking military officers say that Pakistani Army military and intelligence advisers who had been working with the Taliban in Afghanistan were flown to safety in Pakistan during the siege of Kunduz last November, in a series of nighttime airlifts by the Pakistani Air Force!

Controversial Seymour Hersh returns to the pages of the NEW YORKER, according to publishing sources, in the January 28, 2002 edition, hitting racks Monday.

The airlifts "were approved by the Bush Administration," Hersh reports.

The evacuation, which had been conceived of as a limited operation, "apparently slipped out of control, and, as an unintended consequence, an unknown number of Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters managed to join in the exodus."

MORE

One American defense adviser tells Hersh, "Everyone brought their friends with them. You're not going to leave them behind to get their throats cut."

As one senior intelligence official puts it, "Dirt got through the screen."

Indian intelligence officials tell Hersh that they number the escaped officials and fighters at four or five thousand; American intelligence officials put the total far lower. But "the Bush Administration may have done more than simply acquiesce in the rescue effort," Hersh reports.

"At the height of the standoff, according to both a C.I.A. official and a military analyst who has worked with the Delta Force...the Administration ordered the United States Central Command to set up a special air corridor help insure the safety of Pakistani rescue flights from Kunduz to the northwest corner of Pakistan."

The Department of Defense did not respond to a request for comment.

Pakistani leader Pervez Musharraf won American support for the evacuation, Hersh reports, by warning that losing a large number of Pakistanis would jeopardize his political survival.

In India, a recently retired Indian diplomat tells Hersh, the feeling is that "Musharraf has two-timed you. What have you gained? Have you captured Osama bin Laden?"

A senior Indian intelligence official says, "Musharraf can't afford to keep the Taliban in Pakistan. They're dangerous to his own regime. Our reading is that the fighters can go only to Kashmir."

Kashmir remains the flashpoint. "The situation is bloody explosive," a senior Pakistani diplomat says, suggesting that Musharraf has not been given enough credit by the Indian government for the "sweeping changes" he's brought to Pakistan.

A retired C.I.A. officer who served as a station chief in South Asia tells Hersh he found it especially disturbing that each country had "imperfect intelligence" about the other. "Couple that with the fact that these guys have a propensity to believe the worst of each other, and have nuclear weapons, and you end up saying, 'My God, get me the hell out of here.'"

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-184 next last
Comment #141 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade; ThanksBTTT
Excellent!
142 posted on 01/24/2002 10:18:27 AM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
Almost incestuous, I agree. Dare one mention the Mena-BCCI-Promis-China connection? No.
143 posted on 01/24/2002 10:18:48 AM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Askel5; Black Jade
See if you think this info should be banned from FR --- Here

It was deleted about 3 minutes after I posted it. That Ruppert's a real KooK, isn't he?

144 posted on 01/24/2002 10:39:42 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
The magazine indiareacts.com states that “India and Iran will ‘facilitate’ US and Russian plans for ‘limited military action’ against the Taliban.”

This must be the plans for engagement reported by the official journal of the Russia Foreign Service in November 2001 (subsequent to roundtable conferences with Pickering and others of our State Department in August, and with the UN in September).

145 posted on 01/24/2002 10:48:02 AM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Askel5; Mancini; Thinden; OKCSubmariner; LSJohn; Wallaby; Black Jade; independentmind; Jim Robinson
I posted a timeline from Mike Ruppert that deals with the Whole Afgan/WTC/OBL occurances. It was deleted within 3 minutes. Very possibly less time than it would take for anyone to read completely. Here's the article --- "Oh Lucy! - You Gotta Lotta 'Splain' To Do"

I wasn't given the courtesy of even calling it "Garbage" by Jim Robinson like the last post I made from FTW's site by Mike Ruppert,(which, BTW, was posted again a couple of days later by another poster, it was allowed to stay.)

Here's the Question on this issue --- Is FTW banned from "FR"? or does it depend on who posts it? Or is each article scanned for about 3 minutes to see how many times the name Bush appears in it in a questionable connection with underhanded corrupt dealing?

146 posted on 01/24/2002 11:06:58 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
BTW, it would be appreciated, I'm sure, if you'd reply in the open on the above questions.
147 posted on 01/24/2002 11:08:37 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
It's marxist garbage.
148 posted on 01/24/2002 11:11:16 AM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
In other words, anything from FTW is NOT to be posted on FR?
149 posted on 01/24/2002 11:21:21 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
If I come across garbage, I usually throw it out. Thanks, Jim
150 posted on 01/24/2002 11:26:16 AM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"If I come across garbage, I usually throw it out. Thanks, Jim"

I had posted another Mike Ruppert article a while back and it was immediately deleted. Then it was posted again a few days later and it attracted much attention and replies. It stayed. It also showed the complicity of the various government agencies in the WTC/"War" as well as connections to the Bush family.

You replied to me that it was "Garbage". But it stayed the second time because much of it's content was spread into other posted articles.

So how are WE supposed to pre-guess what will be deemed "Garbage" and what won't without open discussion?

151 posted on 01/24/2002 11:33:20 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
I clicked on your link and it won't load.
152 posted on 01/24/2002 11:38:30 AM PST by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: AM2000
Try it again or this one -----

"Oh Lucy! - You Gotta Lotta 'Splain' To Do"

153 posted on 01/24/2002 11:41:12 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
It's resolving but the server just won't respond after that. Maybe if I wait a very long time, it eventually will. But I just don't have the patience to put up with websites like that. Thanks for trying to help, though.
154 posted on 01/24/2002 11:44:03 AM PST by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
You can criticize Bush and his policies all day long on FR. There are a lot of things about the Bush administration that should be criticized, but using obvious leftist propaganda to smear him? No thanks. Had I seen the reposting of your article in question I probably would've deleted it. I do not know anything about FTW, but, so far, everything I've seen written by Ruppert appears to me to be nothing but pure leftist smear (garbage). Hey, if you really believe that our government crashed airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, how can you possibly live with yourself? Why are you still living in America?
155 posted on 01/24/2002 11:54:07 AM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson;rdavis84
You know what they say, one's man garbage . . .
I found it interesting reading and was going to post a second time on it and couldn't. I'm confused about how "garbage" is defined (maybe I missed that thread). Is it on the main page somewhere?
156 posted on 01/24/2002 12:04:48 PM PST by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson;rdavis84
I do not know anything about FTW, . . .

I thought for sure you did. I'm confused!

157 posted on 01/24/2002 12:06:38 PM PST by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: mancini
Should be obvious. The story line alone is pure B/S. Do you really believe that George Bush is involved in a plot to hijack airliners full of people and crash them into buildings?
158 posted on 01/24/2002 12:07:25 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: mancini
You know what they say, one's man garbage . . .

Absolutely. But guess what, this is his site. So what he considers garbage counts. Not what you consider garbage.

159 posted on 01/24/2002 12:11:22 PM PST by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
It was OK with these? Like Mancini said, this is confusing. There has been other discussion about the possibility of Remote Control of airliners. I don't believe the thrust of the article was that Bush was totally aware of any overt action. That wouldn't allow "Plausible Deniabilty". As a matter of interest, I went back and scanned thru the whole article and the only Bush mention I noted was at the end when it mentioned Bush the Elder and Carlyle.

The Democratic Party's Presidential
Drug Money Pipeline

Charles Manatt, Clinton 's New Ambassador to the Dominican Republic Demonstrates the Importance of Drug Money to Election 2000 and to Al Gore

Originally Published as the Cover Story in the April 30, 2000 issue of From The Wilderness (Vol. III, No. 2) Posted on the Worldwide Web July 10, 2000
Written by Michael C. Ruppert

THE TIMELINE TELLS THE STORY
OF HOW THE CIA-DRUG CONTROVERSY
WAS CLINTON'S HOLE CARD IN THE IMPEACHMENT!

Written by M. Rupert

CIA - Drugs and Campaign Fundraising --The Dominicans, The Democrats and New York -----Parts 1&2
by  Michael C. Ruppert

Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D) Covert Action in Africa: A Smoking Gun in Washington, D.C.
by M. Ruppert

 

160 posted on 01/24/2002 12:16:48 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson