[AM2000]

You know what they say, one's man garbage . . .

Absolutely. But guess what, this is his site. So what he considers garbage counts. Not what you consider garbage.

[mancini]

So what he considers garbage counts. Not what you consider garbage.

However, the definition of garbage seems to be fluid.

[rdavis84]

"So what he considers garbage counts. Not what you consider garbage."

Is that a constructive comment? We're trying to understand what PORTION of Mike Ruppert's writing to assess as garbage. That's all.

Evidently the above noted articles Ruppert wrote WEREN'T garbage since they were discussed.

Have you posted some articles that we can assess?