SECRET PAKISTANI AIRLIFT AIDED TALIBAN, AL QAEDA FIGHTERS

The DrudgeReport ^ | January 20, 2002

[Askel5]

Excellent!

[flamefront]

Almost incestuous, I agree. Dare one mention the Mena-BCCI-Promis-China connection? No.

[rdavis84]

See if you think this info should be banned from FR --- Here

It was deleted about 3 minutes after I posted it. That Ruppert's a real KooK, isn't he?

[Askel5]

The magazine indiareacts.com states that “India and Iran will ‘facilitate’ US and Russian plans for ‘limited military action’ against the Taliban.”

This must be the plans for engagement reported by the official journal of the Russia Foreign Service in November 2001 (subsequent to roundtable conferences with Pickering and others of our State Department in August, and with the UN in September).

[rdavis84]

I posted a timeline from Mike Ruppert that deals with the Whole Afgan/WTC/OBL occurances. It was deleted within 3 minutes. Very possibly less time than it would take for anyone to read completely. Here's the article --- "Oh Lucy! - You Gotta Lotta 'Splain' To Do"

I wasn't given the courtesy of even calling it "Garbage" by Jim Robinson like the last post I made from FTW's site by Mike Ruppert,(which, BTW, was posted again a couple of days later by another poster, it was allowed to stay.)

Here's the Question on this issue --- Is FTW banned from "FR"? or does it depend on who posts it? Or is each article scanned for about 3 minutes to see how many times the name Bush appears in it in a questionable connection with underhanded corrupt dealing?

[rdavis84]

BTW, it would be appreciated, I'm sure, if you'd reply in the open on the above questions.

[Jim Robinson]

It's marxist garbage.

[rdavis84]

In other words, anything from FTW is NOT to be posted on FR?

[Jim Robinson]

If I come across garbage, I usually throw it out. Thanks, Jim

[rdavis84]

"If I come across garbage, I usually throw it out. Thanks, Jim"

I had posted another Mike Ruppert article a while back and it was immediately deleted. Then it was posted again a few days later and it attracted much attention and replies. It stayed. It also showed the complicity of the various government agencies in the WTC/"War" as well as connections to the Bush family.

You replied to me that it was "Garbage". But it stayed the second time because much of it's content was spread into other posted articles.

So how are WE supposed to pre-guess what will be deemed "Garbage" and what won't without open discussion?

[AM2000]

I clicked on your link and it won't load.

[rdavis84]

Try it again or this one -----

"Oh Lucy! - You Gotta Lotta 'Splain' To Do"

[AM2000]

It's resolving but the server just won't respond after that. Maybe if I wait a very long time, it eventually will. But I just don't have the patience to put up with websites like that. Thanks for trying to help, though.

[Jim Robinson]

You can criticize Bush and his policies all day long on FR. There are a lot of things about the Bush administration that should be criticized, but using obvious leftist propaganda to smear him? No thanks. Had I seen the reposting of your article in question I probably would've deleted it. I do not know anything about FTW, but, so far, everything I've seen written by Ruppert appears to me to be nothing but pure leftist smear (garbage). Hey, if you really believe that our government crashed airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, how can you possibly live with yourself? Why are you still living in America?

[mancini]

You know what they say, one's man garbage . . .
I found it interesting reading and was going to post a second time on it and couldn't. I'm confused about how "garbage" is defined (maybe I missed that thread). Is it on the main page somewhere?

[mancini]

I do not know anything about FTW, . . .

I thought for sure you did. I'm confused!

[Jim Robinson]

Should be obvious. The story line alone is pure B/S. Do you really believe that George Bush is involved in a plot to hijack airliners full of people and crash them into buildings?

[AM2000]

You know what they say, one's man garbage . . .

Absolutely. But guess what, this is his site. So what he considers garbage counts. Not what you consider garbage.

[rdavis84]

It was OK with these? Like Mancini said, this is confusing. There has been other discussion about the possibility of Remote Control of airliners. I don't believe the thrust of the article was that Bush was totally aware of any overt action. That wouldn't allow "Plausible Deniabilty". As a matter of interest, I went back and scanned thru the whole article and the only Bush mention I noted was at the end when it mentioned Bush the Elder and Carlyle.

The Democratic Party's Presidential
Drug Money Pipeline

Charles Manatt, Clinton 's New Ambassador to the Dominican Republic Demonstrates the Importance of Drug Money to Election 2000 and to Al Gore

Originally Published as the Cover Story in the April 30, 2000 issue of From The Wilderness (Vol. III, No. 2) Posted on the Worldwide Web July 10, 2000
Written by Michael C. Ruppert

THE TIMELINE TELLS THE STORY
OF HOW THE CIA-DRUG CONTROVERSY
WAS CLINTON'S HOLE CARD IN THE IMPEACHMENT!
Written by M. Rupert

CIA - Drugs and Campaign Fundraising --The Dominicans, The Democrats and New York -----Parts 1&2
by  Michael C. Ruppert

Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D) Covert Action in Africa: A Smoking Gun in Washington, D.C.
by M. Ruppert