Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Food stamps for immigrants is 'troubling'
Washington Times ^ | Thursday, January 17, 2002 | By Cheryl Wetzstein

Posted on 01/16/2002 9:52:05 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:36:47 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

House Republican leaders want to know more about a Bush administration plan to reopen the food stamp program to immigrants, but initial reaction to the idea is that it is "troubling," a House aide said this week.

The $17 billion food stamp program is one of several federal welfare programs that have been off-limits to most immigrants since the 1996 welfare reform law.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Quote of the Day by Alberta's Child
1 posted on 01/16/2002 9:52:05 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
""Legal immigrants are respected and contributing members of our society and they deserve this assistance," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat and co-sponsor of a bill to restore food stamps to immigrants."

JH2, I STILL say that the Kennedy Clan disproves, without doubt, the "Bell Curve" theory that "wealthy people are 'genetically' more intelligent than other people." But, then again, there MIGHT be something in the water in Massachusetts Peace and love, George.

2 posted on 01/17/2002 3:01:15 AM PST by George Frm Br00klyn Park
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"Legal immigrants are respected and contributing members of our society and they deserve this assistance," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat and co-sponsor of a bill to restore food stamps to immigrants.

If legal immigrants are indeed respected and contributing members of our society, why do they need food stamps?

3 posted on 01/17/2002 7:07:20 AM PST by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
What happened to the days when an immigrant had to have a U.S. sponsor, a sponsor who would agree to be responsible for the immigrant so that he or she would not go on the dole? What was wrong with that idea? I guess the Teddies of this world thought it was "mean-spirited."
4 posted on 01/17/2002 7:16:10 AM PST by Nea Wood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nea Wood
Actually, the requirement is still in effect for persons who emigrate to the United States LEGALLY! Ask anyone who marrys a foreign bride or wishes to bring a foreign child or parent. They must provide proof of sufficient income and sign documents that make them responsible for the alien until they have worked 40 quarters in the U.S., become U.S. citizens or permanently leave the country. This is part of the Immigration and Nationality Act and is U.S. law. But apparently, Mexican illegals are exempt from the laws. On a secondary note: Remember all those folks who tell you about how illegals pay their fair share of taxes? How many of you know that Mexicans (and Canadians) can claim exemptions on their tax returns for dependents not even in the country? Lemme see here! If Juan Valdez claims ten kids in Mexico, how much chance is there that he will be paying any tax at all? Hmmm! Maybe even qualify for earned income tax credit?
5 posted on 01/17/2002 9:21:01 AM PST by navyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
You are right. When my grandson married a Canadian girl last August 2001, he was not regularly employed having just finishing some college courses. His dad (my son) had to submit proof of his financial ability to support her.

By the way, our govt is so dumb that when they approved her right to emigrate into this country, the govt did NOT provide her the legal right to work in this country!

She had to submit more fees (the real reason?) and basically the same paperwork to get a card permitting her to work. She found work immediately as she had her masters in Social Work and the county needed social workers desperately! Meanwhile her husband (my grandson) could not find work in his chosen work of computer networking (too much competition from workers here on H-1B visas)and took a job at a book store. He is going back to college to add some courses which he hopes will improve his job chances.

6 posted on 01/17/2002 11:36:10 AM PST by Nancy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2,George Frm Br00klyn Park,Nancy
this is back door deal bush make with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy
7 posted on 01/17/2002 5:30:35 PM PST by expose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expose
In exchange for what?
8 posted on 01/17/2002 5:40:36 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
BTTT
9 posted on 03/13/2002 8:23:17 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson